
Originally Posted by
Hitcher
State housing isn't at "market rates". It should be. Why should families of identical means or need be treated differently based on who their landlord is?
Remember that the actual rent on a state rental property is subsidised through taxpayer funded benefits. The taxpayer is picking up the difference between what the tenants actually pay and what it costs to provide the rental property. All of this nonsense about rents being income related is tablets-of-stone dogma that is unthinkingly sicked up by the wet middle classes who are all in favour of state housing, as long as it's not anywhere near where they live.
And since when have "state employees" picked up a hammer or a mop? And back in the day when they may have, how was that any cheaper than an enforceable performance-based contract?
Well this comment is 20 years out of date.
Atheism and Religion are but two sides of the same coin.
One prefers to use its head, while the other relies on tales.
Bookmarks