TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
I would not have a single issue if the law here was the same. A man (or womans) house is her castle, where one should be able to raise ones family securely and in safety. If some clown wants to break in with intent to steal or harm (often goes hand in hand with home invasion burglaries...) ones loved ones, then the occupants should be allowed to protect themselves with deadly force if necessary. It's like walking into a bears lair, do so at your own peril. You can't blame the bear for protecting its home and cubs.
With the increase in violent home invasions, it will be interesting to see some cases such as this tried in NZ. I struggle to see a jury finding you guilty of murder when protecting themselves from intrusion and potential serious harm. The problem is that our self defence laws (section 48 of the =Crimes Act) are not exactly explicit in their wording...ie what is "reasonable" force??
Nail your colours to the mast that all may look upon them and know who you are.
It takes a big man to cry...and an even bigger man to laugh at that man.
So, the intruder was alleged to have a 12" hunting knife.
I remember that thing somebody once told me about "knives" and "gunfights".
The intruder, well, obviously didn't.
Darwin rules.
Not quite. It is about the right to self defense with what ever means comes to hand.
Did you pay attention to the "taking a knife to a gun shop" here in NZ?
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Nail your colours to the mast that all may look upon them and know who you are.
It takes a big man to cry...and an even bigger man to laugh at that man.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks