We have the equivalent of a king to all intents and purposes, a figurehead who is responsible for us all in one way or another. I have no problem with that as the king seeks advice from "wise" men and therefore isn't the be all and end all of the decision making process. Unfortunately that advice comes with $$$ attached and is $$$ focussed in our current society. Without that $$$ they can't make the same decisions and don't have the same power. Why not? Well the only thing that keeps those who want change off the streets is the need to feed our families. To do that we need to earn money. Without money you can bet your arse that there would be more people protesting at the current antics that govern our way of life... potentially leading to blood in the streets I agree. These days the kings power means nothing without the followers. So where the king makes bad policy, he'll know about it pretty damn quickly. A king requires people to follow and as history has shown where kings aren't doing what the people believe are in their best interest, they are deposed in one way or another... Arab spring springs to mind (they will get a rude awakening when "democracy" appears in their region and nothing changes)Originally Posted by avgas
What replaces that is then up to the people. I would HOPE that they would put the free thinkers into "power" or at least the positions of responsibility, passive or not, things would get done as money is no barrier. The possessive, greedy and the aggressive just need the right medication to control their urgesoh the irony eh... they may well seek followers with which to push their agenda, but if 99%, snigger, of people just want to get on with their lives then I doubt they will want a "regime" that purposefully splits the people. Not saying that that's what we have, but it certainly isn't the democracy that's being touted.
No money removes their power in this day and age. The only way they can rule by fear is using an armed force and an armed force cannot stand against a population should the population decide to rise... primarily as not all soldiers will back their leaders if they feel what they are doing is wrong. I'm happy to be very wrong on all counts there, but I can't see "power" surviving undetected in a culture without money.
Note that I say this with bloody burning through my veins.
I'm just a guy and as such don't believe that the way you see things (I fully understand that that's all we know currently) is the only way that we can move forwards.



oh the irony eh... they may well seek followers with which to push their agenda, but if 99%, snigger, of people just want to get on with their lives then I doubt they will want a "regime" that purposefully splits the people. Not saying that that's what we have, but it certainly isn't the democracy that's being touted.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Reply With Quote

but I see no way forwards for humanity where money is the gauge of value. No need for barter, we all do what needs to be done because there are those producing food, treating water, cleaning bins, keeping the sewers clean etc... and we all need to use each others services so it would seem mad to put a value on any one job. You do what you do to help people out, because others are doing what they're doing to help you out (producing food etc...). There will be massive unemployment and more than enough of us to allow us all to have 4 hour days. Educate the upcoming generation well enough (we are not born with a concept of money, it is taught) and teach them the values of doing your bit and I reckon it'll work. Everything "made" in NZ will be free.

. I generally don't read as I'm a very slow reader, veeeeeerrrrrryyyyyyy slooooooooow reader according to Mrs Mash. Did any of the books turn out well? I realise that it's not a new idea and I guess I have a slight prejudice in that it has pretty much redefined my attitude in life, from lazy capitalist to confused socialist to, I dunno, something entirely different, a buddharchist maybe, dunno. Yeah, I could get behind buddharchism
. Given our flaws utopia is probably a few hundred years away, if at all achievable... but I would really really really really like to know what percentage of the population would consider living in such a society.

Bookmarks