Kim Dotcom interview with JC

**SMOKEU** · 3rd March 2012, 17:03

LMFAO that's awesome!

**Big Dave** · 3rd March 2012, 17:09

Originally Posted by avgas

Leaving content on a public (or even 'semi-public') website is like leaving the keys in the ignition at the petrol station.

I call it advertising.

**scumdog** · 3rd March 2012, 18:17

Originally Posted by hayd3n

i see this in the same light as i see a shipping company or storage company
they provide the service
but they have hardly any idea what is in the containers /ship and if there was illegal stuff in them its the resposibility of the content owner/sender not the freight company /storage holder

Hmm drawing a long bow there - if you said the shippers knew what they were shipping was illegal but it wasn't actually for themselves you would be closer to the mark imho...

**k14** · 3rd March 2012, 19:33

Originally Posted by scumdog

Hmm drawing a long bow there - if you said the shippers knew what they were shipping was illegal but it wasn't actually for themselves you would be closer to the mark imho...

No, he is spot on. The postal service would never do that because it is impractical to do so on the volume of parcels/letters that go through it. Same thing for megaupload, 800 files per second and it would be very difficult if not impossible to have a foolproof way of doing it unless a human looked at every single one.

**Big Dave** · 3rd March 2012, 19:39

You tube does it electronically. Data matching software.

I've received a 'do you have a licence for this music?' less than a minute after it was uploaded.

The answer was yes, but they still stuck ads on the video till the reply was processed.

They also removed one of my vids of riding a Gold Wing - because a few bars of Bon Jovi was playing on the bike's stereo as I rode along. Also electronically matched - even over the wind noise.

**k14** · 3rd March 2012, 19:48

Originally Posted by Big Dave

You tube does it electronically. Data matching software.

I've received a 'do you have a licence for this music?' less than a minute after it was uploaded.

The answer was yes, but they still stuck ads on the video till the reply was processed.

They also removed one of my vids of riding a Gold Wing - because a few bars of Bon Jovi was playing on the bike's stereo as I rode along. Also electronically matched - even over the wind noise.

Yeah sure its possible but far from 100% accurate. And I will be very surprised if the ways of matching movies and tv shows are even remotely as advanced.

**ducatilover** · 3rd March 2012, 22:43

Originally Posted by SMOKEU

The jews have been pissed off ever since the NSDAP came to fruition, now they're out to take over the world.

Does being born a Jew mean you're genetically predisposed to being a money hungry coont?

**nosebleed** · 4th March 2012, 08:43

Originally Posted by ducatilover

Does being born a Seth Efrikan mean you're genetically predisposed to being a coont?

Fixed that for ya.

Yes.

**SMOKEU** · 4th March 2012, 08:55

Originally Posted by ducatilover

Does being born a Jew mean you're genetically predisposed to being a money hungry coont?

Pretty much.

**HenryDorsetCase** · 4th March 2012, 09:48

Originally Posted by Big Dave

You tube does it electronically. Data matching software.

I've received a 'do you have a licence for this music?' less than a minute after it was uploaded.

The answer was yes, but they still stuck ads on the video till the reply was processed.

They also removed one of my vids of riding a Gold Wing - because a few bars of Bon Jovi was playing on the bike's stereo as I rode along. Also electronically matched - even over the wind noise.

some might applaud one less iteration of bon jovi anywhere in the world as being a GOOD THING

**scumdog** · 4th March 2012, 09:53

Originally Posted by ducatilover

Does being born a Jew mean you're genetically predisposed to being a money hungry coont?

And does being a money hungry coont automatically make you a Jew?

And if you're not a money hungry coont what does that make you? - a Yarpie?

**Big Dave** · 4th March 2012, 10:20

Originally Posted by HenryDorsetCase

some might applaud one less iteration of bon jovi anywhere in the world as being a GOOD THING

It was on the radio, although there are some on my playlists. There are a few good ones - and some dross.

**Swoop** · 4th March 2012, 18:06

Originally Posted by avgas

Would you pay for it?
Because guess who is going to pay him settlement. Won't be the US......they didn't arrest him. The crown did.

Two preferred options.
1. The US, who pressed the prosecution forward.
2. The NZ Police budget. If their prosecutions fail, then it comes out of their budget. Same for all domestic prosecutions as well.