"...you meet the weirdest people riding a Guzzi !!..."
The Microsoft Flight Simulator X is a bit of cheap fun though.
Nine hours (yes, nine!) from Whenuapai to RAAF Richmond for deployment.
Aircraft...? The lovely Andover.
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
The sad thing about the DC3, is that if designed today, it would never get off the ground.
Even with almost 80 years of proving itself, doing the hard yards, the aviation experts would say it's not safe etc.
" Rule books are for the Guidance of the Wise, and the Obedience of Fools"
Then neither would the Herk and the B-52, both 1950's designs, both likely to be going for many years to come.
"...you meet the weirdest people riding a Guzzi !!..."
One of my favorite photos(from an old school cardboard disposable camera) is riding in the back of an RNZAF Huey on the West Coast flying NOE........the disc was catching the odd branch turning through some deep and steep valleys and reentrants. It was worth slogging thru the West Coast bush just for the helo lift out.
757 flights have been great...and the RNZAF crews have been excellent in my experiences.
Herc flights were a bit more pedestrian......nothing like sitting in the back of a Herc baking on the tarmac in 40 degree heat...once we finally lifted off it was a battle to climb into the nook in the tail to cool off....great aircraft though.....a bit like a turbine powered HiLux with wings.
Interested in seeing one of the new NH90s in the flesh...I heard a rumor the rear ramp might be hard pressed to handle the jandle of our bigger brown bros and XL sized farm boys all tooled up.
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
RNZAF Aircraft
Flying Displays:
Red Checkers
Boeing 757
Kiwi Blue Parachute Team
C-130 Hercules
P-3K Orion
UH-1H Iroquois
SH-2G Seasprite
A109 LUH
B200 King Air
Historic Flight Tiger Moth, Harvard and Sioux
Static Displays:
NH90
Upgraded C-130 Hercules (LEP)
International Aircraft
Flying and Static Displays:
Royal Australian Air Force F-18A Hornet
United States Air Force C-17
Static Displays:
Royal Australian Air Force B737 Wedgetail
Royal Australian Air Force C-17
Royal Australian Air Force C-130J
Singapore Air Force C-130
French Armed Forces of New Caledonia CASA 235
US Marine Corps KC-130
RAF A330 MRTT
Warbirds and Civilian Aircraft
Bristol Fighter
Fokker DVII
WWII types:
Spitfire IX
Spitfire Tr IX
TBM Avenger
Dakota
Auster
Anson
Beaver
2 x P-40 Kittyhawk
FG-1D Corsair
P-51 Mustang
Teams:
Yak aerobatic team
Harvard aerobatic team
Jets:
Vampire
Strikemaster
Hunter
Civilian:
MX2
Thunder Mustang
PAC750XL
Beech Texan
Gryocopters
Suck, Squeeze, Bang, Blow aren’t just the 4 cycles of an engine
You are both right.
From a modern design philosophy point of view there aren't many aircraft designed in the 50's and 60's that would be built that way today.
The reliability engineers and designers have discovered that an aircraft is much more reliable if you don't keep trying to fix it!
Less maintenance is more... Also means the aircraft is more productive too... Less down time, and more revenue.
As for military aircraft though, that don't have to turn a seat into a $, well it is still the same.... So according to the brochure you need less men to fix them.
Not always the case, as military aircraft don't really do "Line Haul" and have many more random failures due to the environment they operate in.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks