He did it because he is weak.
I can't see any more reason for blowing money on him then any other piece of scum, Put a bullet in his head and carry on.
He did it because he is weak.
I can't see any more reason for blowing money on him then any other piece of scum, Put a bullet in his head and carry on.
Isin't it Desperation that causes people to snap and kill someone like this? We hear about the obvious actions of the killer, but there is always two sides to the storry. Not that I condone what he did.
The same could be said in the case of Mr Weatherstone, picking up a knife and stabbing his ex almost 200 times.
The question that will never be answered is what drove them to such desperation to do what they did. And by that I mean that the other side of the story is the one that died.
I've spent my money on bikes, booze and babes. The rest I've wasted....
I'm trying to pin down your logic here.
Do you have a theory about the killer's motivation to share, or is your contribution going to be limited to pointing out that killing her with a baseball bat was easier than killing a bear while unarmed?
In related news, water remains wet, etc.
Actually, come to think of it, I'd tend to suspect that you'd need to be a bit less rational to kill a dumb animal that'd done you no wrong than you'd be to kill someone who you had reason to believe was likely to carve a trail of havoc through society that started with your own child.
Just, y'know. Just sayin'.
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
You're indulging in a spot of table-thumping assertion here. But you have no theories to share about why the man might've done it, yes?
See, being 'weak' doesn't generally just make people go out and start killin' on people. Generally what happens is, the dead person does something to piss the killer off.
And generally, the killer is obviously a person of either limited intelligence or low emotional maturity, whose judgement was compromised by one or t'other to the extent of doing something that benefited nobody and got them locked up.
However, I'm not sure that that applies, here. Limited intelligence, evidently not. Low emotional maturity, no evidence to suggest that beyond the killing itself.
So the question is... what was the perceived benefit of the killing to the killer?
An otherwise respectable and relatively high-functioning member of society planned and executed a cold-blooded murder, attempted to hide the evidence, and quietly pleaded guilty when that attempt failed. It's an interesting deviation to the usual pattern of 'dumb fuck snaps and kills someone, then either sits blubbing in a police interview room about how sorry they are, or angrily denies responsibility in the face of the obvious'.
Responding emotionally oneself and ranting about actions being 'weak' is... missing the point.
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
Dismissive of your supposed point.
Your assessment of his intelligence is meaningless, Fucker made the worst decision of his life and everyone else gets to suffer, Its a weak act, and on par with every other douchebag who dealt with his issues by bashing someone who was practically defenseless to death with a weapon.
One does find oneself more in agreement with the position stated by Mr H Banger than the position stated by Mr J Random, which can be summarised in the proposition: It matters not, forsooth, the reason 'twere done, the fact of such doing, motivation aside, is enough to bring sanction"
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
I believe this to be an unwarranted leap.
It must be acknowledged that sometimes, there be folks needin' killin'. Hitler is canonical, and it's shades of grey from there on down.
My original post can be expanded to the question of whether, given a sufficiently light penalty (thirteen years in jail isn't the worst thing ever) and a sufficiently problematic target, killin' on one's own authority, against the dictates of society, might not very occasionally be the act of a sane, functional, and emotionally mature individual. Sanction being accepted and balanced against the benefit of the act itself, etc.
Edit: as a side point, I'd suggest that the value of the death penalty as a deterrent only applies to this very small minority of murderers. One suspects it would've deterred Mr Callaghan.
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks