
Originally Posted by
sleemanj
Not to defend a helmet which I've only worn a couple of hours so far, but you have to consider when looking at Sharp ratings, not just for this helmet, but budget helmets in general in NZ that it's main competitors here based on price and features are I think simply not rated by Sharp at all, so doesn't help us compare.
If we look at TradeMe to find the main competitors on price and having an internal visor, we come up with this sort of a list
1-Tonne:
http://www.trademe.co.nz/motors/moto...-464898703.htm
CNELL:
http://www.trademe.co.nz/motors/moto...-464750488.htm
And that's about it, basically the next Sharp rated offering would be the Cabergs at about $300 which is twice the retail of these budget priced lids.
If one wants to spend more on a lid than the budget price, they are probably not going to buy a budget lid, and once you get out of that bracket the Sharp ratings become more available.
Perhaps MotoNZ should see about working with the UK government to get our locally available budget offerings rated.
I see the logic in what you say, however as a general rule we come to expect that safer products often demand a premium and that cheapness is usually associated with higher failure risk. It comes down to the level of safety you want and the value which you place on it.
As a matter of interest the Box/Oxford and Caberg Trip retail for about the same (90 pounds) in the UK. A lot of our choices (or lack thereof) are dictated by local distributor interest. Caberg have only recently attracted a local distributor.
Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.
Bookmarks