Beneficiary contraception plan 'intrusive'

[Tigadee]

It seems to me that Paula Bennet has missed a solid half of the market share by offering this to women only.

Because we men are wild, elusive beasts who can't be nailed down... Actually, the head honchos in Gov't are male, so any idea pertaining to restricting a male's reproductive function (*snip*snip*) probably draws a lot of incredulous looks at Ms Bennet, followed by hysterical laughter.

On a slightly serious note, men produce millions of sperm, while women release one or even sometimes two eggs a month, so it's easier to stop those one or two eggs with certainlty than it is try to stop millions of tadpoles.

Wouldn't a side-benefit of some of the contraceptives for women be that they do not experience their monthly cycle any more? No more cramps, no more moods, and think of the savings on pads!

[scott411]

I think that any male beneficary should be offered the snip if they want it as well,

[mashman]

Wouldn't a side-benefit of some of the contraceptives for women be that they do not experience their monthly cycle any more? No more cramps, no more moods, and think of the savings on pads!

I wish... no, the mood swings are still there except they are amplified and not restricted to 1 week per month. My ex was on the 3 monthly jag and it made our lives a living nightmare. Others we knew shared the same view. Pumping hormones into the body without there being a reaction just ain't gonna happen. If the govt are serious about it and ladies are not wanting to get preggers, then it should be a french tickler for the fella. It's the less invasive of ALL contraceptions and only hard core Education (meaning of life ) and personal choice is gonna change what the govt are expecting to change with yet another piece of wishful thinking...

[imac]

Point of order, a vasectomy is generally considered irreversible and although the Vas can be reconnected it has a high failure rate particularly among older men.
More effort should be focused on the men that get these girls pregnant and then fuck off leaving her to raise the baby without a father in it’s life. Perhaps a certain amount of their benefit should be docked and sent their child’s mum for additional child support

[Little Miss Trouble]

I wish... no, the mood swings are still there except they are amplified and not restricted to 1 week per month. My ex was on the 3 monthly jag and it made our lives a living nightmare. Others we knew shared the same view. Pumping hormones into the body without there being a reaction just ain't gonna happen. If the govt are serious about it and ladies are not wanting to get preggers, then it should be a french tickler for the fella. It's the less invasive of ALL contraceptions and only hard core Education (meaning of life ) and personal choice is gonna change what the govt are expecting to change with yet another piece of wishful thinking...

Sorry your ex had problems on the jab, but others such as myself have been using this very successfully for rather a long time now.

P.s. some women are just moodier than others too

[Tigadee]

Point of order, a vasectomy is generally considered irreversible and although the Vas can be reconnected it has a high failure rate particularly among older men.

More effort should be focused on the men that get these girls pregnant and then fuck off leaving her to raise the baby without a father in it’s life. Perhaps a certain amount of their benefit should be docked and sent their child’s mum for additional child support

Wouldn't the vasectomy be a more effective solution then?

[oneofsix]

Wouldn't the vasectomy be a more effective solution then?

Castration sounds more like what you are thinking of

Most don't remain on the benefit so they must be afforded the opportunity to be fertile once they have learnt to provide for them and their offspring once they are financially productive members of society. Financially productive members of society must have productive members .

[mashman]

Sorry your ex had problems on the jab, but others such as myself have been using this very successfully for rather a long time now.

P.s. some women are just moodier than others too

Settle pettle ... I guess ya never hear about the positive stories.

(there may be something to that )

[Little Miss Trouble]

Settle pettle ... I guess ya never hear about the positive stories.

(there may be something to that )

Some men too it seems...

[mashman]

Some men too it seems...

waaa ha ha ha haaaaa

[Tigadee]

Financially productive members of society must have productive members.

And really, the world's population is big enough already, coupled with dwindling global resources. Isn't it good that contraceptives will be made even more accessible/available?

We can't expect people to be celibate or abstain, so we should then make it that certain aspects of the fornication process be put on hold or interrupted, to place less pressure on society. Heck, if they can't keep it in their pants, then the least they can do is allow for preggers interruptus to be implemented.

[blue rider]

Because we men are wild, elusive beasts who can't be nailed down... Actually, the head honchos in Gov't are male, so any idea pertaining to restricting a male's reproductive function (*snip*snip*) probably draws a lot of incredulous looks at Ms Bennet, followed by hysterical laughter.

On a slightly serious note, men produce millions of sperm, while women release one or even sometimes two eggs a month, so it's easier to stop those one or two eggs with certainlty than it is try to stop millions of tadpoles.

Wouldn't a side-benefit of some of the contraceptives for women be that they do not experience their monthly cycle any more? No more cramps, no more moods, and think of the savings on pads!

it takes a women nine month to produce one child....
the father or this child, could, during these nine month produce several dozens more.

so it is way more cost effective to snip snip the male.....

personally i believe that contraceptive should be free regardless of the financial health of the female, and then i believe that sex ed could go a long way etc. etc.

but its much more fun to go after the career beneficiaries who are all single mums...and who all suffered form immaculate conception on purpose, as no male was ever included in the making of any of their children

[puddytat]

I feel that in this day & age contraception should be free.
Like wise, anyone who has had a child or not, should be able to have themselves sterilised for free.
And for fellas that have enough kids & would like the missus not to take the "Pill" becuse of one reason or another,should seriously consider getting cut. Who wants to wear a joe ffs

[sidecar bob]

Im not sure why the beneficiaries are pissed off about this, theyre being given an option on getting another something for nothing.
The good old taxpayer is the one that should be havin a bleat, but na, as usual, theyre too busy making a living & happy wilth their lot to be losing too much sleep over the fact that they are funding it.
I discovered that if you give a loser free shit, they always seem to find a reason to feel aggrieved about it.

[XxKiTtiExX]

Wouldn't a side-benefit of some of the contraceptives for women be that they do not experience their monthly cycle any more? No more cramps, no more moods, and think of the savings on pads!

Some/most women still get their monthly cycle while on contraceptives, a select few are lucky enough that they don't. Some unfortunately bleed heavier than normal. And as for "no more moods?" Obviously you haven't experienced a woman who reacts badly to some things used in the contraceptive. And just think, once its injected (depo for example) its there until it wears off You could have 6+ months worth of crazy!!!