Beneficiary contraception plan 'intrusive'

[Tigadee]

it takes a women nine month to produce one child....
the father or this child, could, during these nine month produce several dozens more.

so it is way more cost effective to snip snip the male.....

I think I will have agree with that logic...

, and then i believe that sex ed could go a long way etc. etc.

Noble sentiment but it has been done and I don't think it's worked out very well... Unless sex ed is to tell boys "that you can feel as much with a condom on as when you don't", or "if you get a girl pregnant, you should take it upon your responsibility to get a job, help bring up the child, stand by the woman and even marry her", etc.

but its much more fun to go after the career beneficiaries who are all single mums...and who all suffered form immaculate conception on purpose, as no male was ever included in the making of any of their children

True, and snip snip takes care of half the problem already, aye?

You could have 6+ months worth of crazy!!!

for six months at a time?! OK men, line up for *snip*snip!

[oldrider]

Nazional Party Eugenics programme, step 1. First its "voluntary" then its "complusory" then its "strength thru joy" then its "just line up over there for the showers".

the upcoming war is not between races, or stupid religions, its between the haves, and have nots.

Can't say I disagree to much with with that but the way I see it is that the haves are not able to breed because they can't afford to because of having to pay so much for the have nots breeding behaviours!

Bradford has really got her head up her arse on this subject, she wants everything both ways FFS!

As long as it remains freedom of choice I would rather support voluntary contraception than unwanted kids being bashed to death or maimed for life!

I suppose some will say I have got my own head up my arse , to each his own I spose! (maybe I have)

[RDJ]

There Ain't No Such Thing As Free Contraception

If it is free to Paulette, it's because someone is taking money away from Petra's earnings to pay for it. People who earn are expected to pay twice, once for their own, and once more for another's.

It's a fascinating study in internal illogic, that there is such a huge overlap between the part of the population that demands "taxpayers (in this context usually Conservatives) we insist you stay out of our bedrooms" and the part of the population that demands "taxpayers, we insist you pay for what we want to do in our bedrooms".

[RDJ]

Im not sure why the beneficiaries are pissed off about this, theyre being given an option on getting another something for nothing.
The good old taxpayer is the one that should be havin a bleat, but na, as usual, theyre too busy making a living & happy wilth their lot to be losing too much sleep over the fact that they are funding it.
I discovered that if you give a loser free shit, they always seem to find a reason to feel aggrieved about it.

and if you suddenly stop giving them free stuff, it's a breach of their Human Right to said free stuff and they call out the Waaaaahmbulance (and usually publicly funded lawyers as well)

[unstuck]

I got snipped after the 3rd was born, why the fuck would you want any more than 3. My sister in law has 6 kids and has nothing to do with any of them, and the first one, her and her partner nearly beat to death before she was 1yr old. She shouldn't of been allowed any more(in my opinion she should of been put to death,along with her then partner). We finally got all of her kids removed after a huge battle with various government departments. I payed(quite alot) to get her steralized, because no one else would. It was either that or kill the fucked up piece of shit. Her kids are now healthy, loved, beautiful people, and they are still within the family. But she is not allowed near them, thank god. The biggest thing that upset her, was no more money from the government.