I am quite keen on starting a Freetech 50 moment. I know one guy in AK that might be keen. So thats 2. You boys want to play? No more than 50cc no more than 6 gears.
That motor is not used for F3 Husa as it's a small 500 so heavy and bulky. No aftermarket modern barrels available either - and the OE ain't that flash. Sell you two barrels if you want...
Yes, F3 was all about diversity - helped by open fuel which made some weird shit competitive.
To keep buckets that diverse should be the aim. trouble is you've got two schools of bucket racing developing, north and south. Which seems to divide naturally into 2T and 4T...
If anyone is stirring about capacities etc it's not me. i reckon the existing setup works. If it ain't broke don't fix it. Lets see the winning 2t's from the short tracks make the transition to bigger ones before changing anything.
Neil was making up some modern RG cylinders from memory, 500 ones though
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/at...3&d=1413097367
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/at...4&d=1413097367
but not an issue although pistons are ,the engine is sub 40KG, so much less heavy and bulky some some others.
the fact it was designed as a 500 I see as a bonus as it has more room for modern transfers and as a square stroke as a 400.
What a NC30 engine weigh? They are lumpy buggars.
I feel the same re the rest.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
The rules are currently the same, why would they change if a N.I. bike headed south and win or vice versa? Basically, to be at the pointy end of racing your not going to be able to turn up on a stock fxr and win. Why change the rules to dumb it down? There is nothing stopping anyone building a bike witch is competitive, or to copy what someone else has built. And if you think it all should cost a couple of hundred dollars......
I know I know. Hard to really nut out. What I would suggest is everyone that is unclear on the rules put, lets say a grand into my bank account and I will come explain it. With further seminars, at additional cost I must add and one on one tuition. I think we could make it work.![]()
Cmon Kerry don't be a whiny bitch, you're smarter than that. Natanial beat us all on his 21 HP bike first year. he actually preferred that to his dads 24 HP bike as it had a much better power spread. Something a 156 will always have.
And NF4 against GPR? Well I've ridden Brents when it was TZR. Shit I knew I was in trouble. It turned so much better it wasn't funny.
But I couldn't afford to buy one. My NF4 cost $500 once Bits sold off.
Natainial is at a disadvantage with an NF4. Get used to it.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Not sure what was whiny about it. Made an observation and gave some solutions. Buckets isn't a stagnant form of racing, and I don't see why some discussion can't be had to make it more even. And this is coming from someone who has helped build a 31hp two stroke. I don't like seeing this form of racing become a benefit concert for some, would rather see it still possible for people of limited means to also figure at the top end.
It is what Buckets came from.
It just handled so much better than mine, and the suspension was in another league. Fix the crazy footpeg position and clean up the jetting and I could have won on that bike. Put someone talented on it, say Sketchy in his prime, or Hamish, and I'd say they could beat Nathaniel. 18hp and all.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks