
Originally Posted by
blue rider
Why do people that are not going to war need assault rifles? Why do they need guns that shoot many bullets at a time at high speed? and why whould the restriction of assoult weapons and/or semi automatic uns/rifles diminish the right of someone to legally own a standard type gun.
i know really nothing about guns and weapons in general as I really don't find them apealing in any which way.
So to the gun owners, why would you promote the legal sale, (and the USA has some really lax regulations as to who can sell and who can buy) of military style weapons.
And why would you - the gun enthousiast - feel infringed by not having the right to buy a rifle akin to a kalachnikov.
please do enlighten me, cause I don't get it.
I guess you could apply the same line of questioning to the arguement for owning high powered bikes as opposed to 'senseable' bikes. Why buy a 170hp sports bike when a 50hp bike will do everything at legal speeds etc.
I think the gun culture in America is way beyond reigning in.
" Rule books are for the Guidance of the Wise, and the Obedience of Fools"
Bookmarks