Some of you should've waited on the coroner's report before spewing your bile

**Kickaha** · 29th July 2012, 21:52

Originally Posted by Drew

Where the fuck do you live old man, I'm coming to find you!

Forgotten already? early onset alzheimers?

Originally Posted by HenryDorsetCase

I particularly like your Nathan Explosion avatar. it seems somehow, ....... apt.

Drew looks just like him except smaller, balder and weedier

**Delerium** · 29th July 2012, 22:47

Originally Posted by short-circuit

I was referring to the injuries relating to the attack. Those suffered prior I cannot account for. My guess is that no one else can either. As I have stated numerous times already, this thread is about a mass reaction to the mother specifically and examining the basis for it. She has since been cleared catagorically of any culpability and yet as her lawyer said, had she been tried she would not have been given a fair trial.

Do you breathe without being reminded that you need to in order to remain alive?

**Crasherfromwayback** · 29th July 2012, 23:17

Originally Posted by short-circuit

Nope. I'm just not a bottom feeder. .

You're no more intelligent than one though, despite you thinking otherwise.

**Drew** · 30th July 2012, 06:23

Originally Posted by Kickaha

Forgotten already? early onset alzheimers?

Drew looks just like him except smaller, balder and weedier

It's the first or second left after the round about? I always end up doing a couple laps of the block before I spy the place.

Awww, you're such a sweet talker!

**Brett** · 30th July 2012, 08:43

Originally Posted by HenryDorsetCase

ad hominem. I may be a pedant: but you attempted to suggest that judgments and assumptions were the same. They are not. And, lest we forget, the judgment was "not guilty": we are discussing judgment in that sense, no? Important to agree on terms before commencing. I am wearing glasses, not blinkers. Thank you for enquiring, but my bowel movement today was not a spout, more a series of clumps. I put that down to good diet, a lot of fibre, and exercise.

I think that instead of studying whatever it is you have studied (and I have zero interest in googling the two things you mention which, from the fact they are capitalised, I infer you attach some importance to, and that you might think confer some scholarly authority to your drivel). My suggestion is that you undertake a course of study with some actual intellectual and academic rigor.

I'm not sure if you could cope, but start here:

http://www.victoria.ac.nz/hppi/study...sophy/phil-123

http://www.victoria.ac.nz/hppi/study...sophy/phil-106

http://www.victoria.ac.nz/hppi/study...sophy/phil-105

http://www.victoria.ac.nz/hppi/study...sophy/phil-104

then add

http://victoria.ac.nz/law/study/courses/laws-121

These are all 100 level.

You might like to do a bit of pre-entry reading: I've found this book useful:

http://www.bookdepository.co.uk/Crim.../9780071446433

Basically, what I am trying to tell you is that, you need to think about stuff, and I am trying to equip you with the tools to do that.

Because you've demonstrated a woeful lack in that regard.

Oh yeah, did you not understand the point of my post #144. You had stated that in effect it was not the fault of the family that there were TWO DEAD BABIES, but it was society's fault. I am a member of society, and I disagree: hence my humorous retort. Sorry if that went over your head.

Shit no, you've gone over his head there, I think he would be better off starting with Dr. Seuss' The Cat in the Hat.

**Swoop** · 30th July 2012, 09:22

Originally Posted by Brett

Shit no, you've gone over his head there, I think he would be better off starting with Dr. Seuss' The Cat in the Hat.

Too advanced for Mr Circuit.
Dot-to-dot puzzles or colouring in books would be more apt.

Edit: This thread only confirms one thing. Defending the indefensible is a sad indictment on individuals and of society.

**short-circuit** · 30th July 2012, 09:26

The previous two pages prove what exactly? My point? Well done team

**Drew** · 30th July 2012, 09:39

Originally Posted by short-circuit

The previous two pages prove what exactly? My point? Well done team

If there was no war, I'd be a millionaire.

See, I can make fuckin stupid random statements too.

**Paul in NZ** · 30th July 2012, 09:52

Originally Posted by short-circuit

The previous two pages prove what exactly? My point? Well done team

It proves that you have a unique talent to annoy people and to also underestimate their intelligence. Intelligence isn't manifest in an ability to drop impressive pseudo science words into a web forum but in this case its more around a knowledge of how the world actually works.

Its all very well using these fancy words but they don't actually disguise the fact that in this case you are wrong. She does not deserve an apology and in fact considering how much of my tax dollars have gone into this whole affair and before / since feeding her and her family I really think she owes me an apology. As for the ultimate apology - to her two sons I suspect she cares less about that than she does the perceived insults to herself.

I've raised kids and now my kids are raising their kids - all of them work in early childhood or teaching, in short raising kids is something I know a little about. There is not one of them, despite difficulties, that would fail so abjectly in their care of their children as she has. While she may have not committed the actual deed you cannot for a second think that she is not complicit in this. The setting of the scene over a period of time is as much down to her as anyone else.

If the people of this forum and the general public are angry its because of this. Its because of what she represents as much as anything. In general people here and the general public are generous and fair minded but in this case - not so. We have had enough of sweeping up after this trash, white, black or brown.

**Crasherfromwayback** · 30th July 2012, 10:04

Originally Posted by short-circuit

The previous pages prove what exactly?

That you're 100% full of shit and wouldn't have a fucking clue what you're talking about.

**SMOKEU** · 30th July 2012, 10:04

**Drew** · 30th July 2012, 10:08

Originally Posted by Paul in NZ

In general people here and the general public are generous and fair minded but in this case - not so. We have had enough of sweeping up after this trash, white, black or brown.

And you were doing so well. The general public are not fair minded in my view, or our news reporters and stations would be held accountable for presenting things in such a one sided fashion.

Spot on with the rest though.

**MisterD** · 30th July 2012, 10:12

Originally Posted by JimO

would that be the same coroner who ruled that the only people to actually help Arena Asher contributed to her death

No, different coroner, but your point addresses the OP's "The coroner says, so it must be true" stance very well indeed.

By the standards of the Asher report, the GP who sent the parents down the road to Muddlemore rather than calling an ambo "contributed" to the deaths of the twins.