Visit the team here - teambentley
Thanks to my sponsors : The Station Sports Cafe and Bar | TSS Red Baron | Zany Zeus | Continental | The Office Relocation Company | Fine Signs | Stokes Valley Collision Repair | CBWD Digital Media Inbound Marketing
Idd rather watch bikes I could buy race.
Idd rather the riders were payed and if you couldnt afford a Stroud etc you should invest in a 3 year deal with a new rider instead rather than 100k on a bike.
Fairings, can, fork internals and rear aftermarket suspension as per what avaliable to public only sounds good.
I have evolved as a KB member.Now nothing I say should be taken seriously.
"That's rooted!! What's next??"
Nah, any discussion is better than no discussion, Billy. Lose the nom de plumes and anonymity and all of a sudden most folks find their manners again.....I did say "most" didn't I?
C'mon on down from that complimentary MNZ penthouse suite and roll in the muck with the rest of us mate! I dunno if you did it as kid but I remember standing with bare feet (shoes were for "going out", not every day wear) in warm cow pats on cold mornings....KB inspires much the same feelings of disgust vs a peculiar warmth.
I fear the day technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots! ALBERT EINSTEIN
Good point. Also only the people paying the bills should have a say in class rules not the ones sending them. And the top 5 in SBK or 600's would still be top 5 if on superstock bikes. MNZ should harden up and say "these are the rules for 2014 onwards" end of story. People with there own personal agendas will have to suck it up. Aaron Slight was all for the idea of Superstock since the std bikes are so good now days - but what would he know.
Point 1, I Agree, And through my rose coloured glasses - It would we great if all those involved in the sport and running it were willing to listen and be supportive of any sensibly based, constructive ideas that are good for the sport as a whole. The veil of listening is there - But the outcomes are driven by many matters outside of what some might argue are not in the interests of the members. (although Billy is a fresh of breath air communication-wise)
Point 2, I am yet to have it sufficiently explained to me the reasoning behind running two standalone classes in little-ole NZ for the two premier classes. I personally have no agenda for asking for that explanation. I do understand "why" it happened - but i cant get a grip on the reasoning behind it.
Point 3, Agree on the top 5 finishers most likely not really changing much irrespective of the steed spec they are on (except maybe the order they finish in) Especially if (god forbid) a control tyre was introduced, which is the single most important cost control issue related to our sport.
One hassle with the concept is as J Holmes pointed out, - some brands within some model years will suffer if they are released in a more "road-spec" form of tune. This isnt neccesarily a problem for the competitor, but it appears to be a pretty big one for the distributer of said brand if/when they are affected. (please note my reference here is NOT brand specific as this could affect any brand)
But on that note, and with me being a medium sized business owner of many years, i can fully understand the distributer of a product being a little unsettled about their patrticular product being placed in that situation - However that is where point No1 comes into play.
(excuse the spelling) GW
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks