Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 27 of 27

Thread: Who needs enemies when there's family?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    3rd May 2005 - 11:51
    Bike
    XR200
    Location
    Invercargill - Arrowtn
    Posts
    1,395
    Cancer is a generic name given to about 200 different types of unregulated cell growth. Normal cells divide and grow until they have repaired or replaced dead cells, then they stop. Cancerous cells keep right on going.

    There can't be a single cure for cancer because it occurs in so many different ways, but eventually a range of cures will be found.

    I seriously doubt that big pharma is suppressing medicines. If they were then Herceptin would not be available. A mate of mine has been employed researching a cure for arthritis for 20 years. That's 20 years of salaries and expensive laboratories...with no result.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    26th September 2006 - 16:33
    Bike
    Suzuki Smash 2016. (Yes, really!)
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,325
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul in NZ View Post

    By way of evidence without going into specifics... Cancer and things like diabetes, asthma, obesity, arthritis etc etc and all lumped together as diseases of affluence and occur more regularly in wealthy societies than in primitive ones. If you want to read about it try reading 'The China Study'..
    What a coincidence! Funny that these are the most serious diseases of the affluent society and these are diseases that can be "controlled" with medication which only the affluent can afford. Note I said, "controlled"; curing would kill the goose that laid the golden egg.
    Note also, that the common diseases prevalent in the third world countries have few or no drugs available... there would be no profit in that!
    "Statistics are used as a drunk uses lampposts - for support, not illumination."

  3. #18
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    Quote Originally Posted by Daffyd View Post
    Note also, that the common diseases prevalent in the third world countries have few or no drugs available... there would be no profit in that!
    What's your point? Companies have shareholders, shareholders expect to get paid. They don't get paid, nobody gets squat. They should be making unprofitable drugs for what? Out of the goodness of their hearts? To be nice neighbours?

  4. #19
    Join Date
    26th September 2006 - 16:33
    Bike
    Suzuki Smash 2016. (Yes, really!)
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,325
    Quote Originally Posted by imdying View Post
    What's your point? Companies have shareholders, shareholders expect to get paid. They don't get paid, nobody gets squat. They should be making unprofitable drugs for what? Out of the goodness of their hearts? To be nice neighbours?
    There's a difference between reasonable and excessive profit. Why can't some of the excessive profits be channeled into providing cheap drugs for poorer countries. Has the idea of good PR died a natural death?
    "Statistics are used as a drunk uses lampposts - for support, not illumination."

  5. #20
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    Quote Originally Posted by Daffyd View Post
    There's a difference between reasonable and excessive profit.
    No there is not. Either they're providing a product at a price people will pay, or they're not. If they're not charging as much as they can get away with, they're just stupid.

    Quote Originally Posted by Daffyd View Post
    Why can't some of the excessive profits be channeled into providing cheap drugs for poorer countries.
    Because those poorer countries aren't shareholders, which is where excess profits should be channelled. It's a business, not a charity.

    Quote Originally Posted by Daffyd View Post
    Has the idea of good PR died a natural death?
    They don't need it, and why should they; they provide a service to their paying customers, which is the whole point of being in business.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    26th September 2006 - 16:33
    Bike
    Suzuki Smash 2016. (Yes, really!)
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,325
    Quote Originally Posted by imdying View Post
    No there is not. Either they're providing a product at a price people will pay, or they're not. If they're not charging as much as they can get away with, they're just stupid.

    Because those poorer countries aren't shareholders, which is where excess profits should be channelled. It's a business, not a charity.

    They don't need it, and why should they; they provide a service to their paying customers, which is the whole point of being in business.
    I'm afraid we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one.
    "Statistics are used as a drunk uses lampposts - for support, not illumination."

  7. #22
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    Sure... I'm not sure where you hippies get off giving away other peoples money though.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    26th September 2006 - 16:33
    Bike
    Suzuki Smash 2016. (Yes, really!)
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,325
    Quote Originally Posted by imdying View Post
    Sure... I'm not sure where you hippies get off giving away other peoples money though.
    I've never been called that before. FYI I'm a 70yo middle-class white male; you know, the most discriminated against class; who spent all my working life, (until May this year), and paying tax; sometimes excessively. I am now happy to receive the govt superannuation which is now my only income. I chose to move to the Philippines so I could remarry and live closer to the two children that I sponsor.

    Is that your idea of a hippie?
    "Statistics are used as a drunk uses lampposts - for support, not illumination."

  9. #24
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    Quote Originally Posted by Daffyd View Post
    Why can't some of the excessive profits be channeled into providing cheap drugs for poorer countries.
    Hippy behaviour.

    Quote Originally Posted by Daffyd View Post
    Has the idea of good PR died a natural death?
    Why don't you just call it karma and be done with it ya dirty hippy

  10. #25
    Join Date
    24th July 2006 - 11:53
    Bike
    KTM 1290 SAR
    Location
    Wgtn
    Posts
    5,541
    Quote Originally Posted by Daffyd View Post
    It makes me so bloody angry to read this. To know there IS a cure for cancer, but big "Pharma" is sitting on it because there is no money in curing it! The bastards should all be lynched!
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul in NZ View Post
    If you want to read about it try reading 'The China Study'..
    I did. I found it difficult to understand, and went looking for some simpler correlation, and found this: http://rawfoodsos.com/2010/07/07/the...act-or-fallac/
    Which treated the same data in a manner a statistician might better approve of. Certainly, as a read it seemed to be less stilted, and coincidentially dissagreed with most of the original study's findings.
    Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon

  11. #26
    Join Date
    6th May 2008 - 14:15
    Bike
    She resents being called a bike
    Location
    Wellllie
    Posts
    1,494
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Daffyd View Post
    It makes me so bloody angry to read this. To know there IS a cure for cancer, but big "Pharma" is sitting on it because there is no money in curing it! The bastards should all be lynched!
    maybe big pharma aren't required at all and I believe that there were those before him, Dr. John HOLT being 1 and I'm pretty sure I saw something a couple of months ago that was discussing similar "technology" back in the 50's.
    I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!

  12. #27
    Join Date
    3rd May 2005 - 11:51
    Bike
    XR200
    Location
    Invercargill - Arrowtn
    Posts
    1,395
    Quote Originally Posted by mashman View Post
    maybe big pharma aren't required at all and I believe that there were those before him, Dr. John HOLT being 1 and I'm pretty sure I saw something a couple of months ago that was discussing similar "technology" back in the 50's.
    Mashie: let us be serious for a moment. Cancer is no fun. I have watched family members die slowly from this insidious disease. One lady tried alternative therapies which cost her and her husband their life savings...and she died right on schedule 5 years - as the doctors predicted.

    If there really was a miracle treatment out there medical researchers would have seized on it decades ago and it would be used in our hospitals. The rich and the powerful are just as vulnerable as you and I. There are no simple answers.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •