Time to give-up on the sad OEM red thing supporting my swing arm.
Wanting to locate for my 2005 Hornet 919 a Yellow model, Ohlins 46DR
Time to give-up on the sad OEM red thing supporting my swing arm.
Wanting to locate for my 2005 Hornet 919 a Yellow model, Ohlins 46DR
or a 46HRCS
Unfortunately I google 46dr ohlins (pages only in NZ) and only find me talking about it .. crikey![]()
Get the eye sizes, and buy anything the same. Then get it sprung and valved, and made the right length for the Hornet.
Can't see any reason someone would sell an ohlins shock for a Hornet unless it's written off. Given how bad the standard one is.
The one called the Ohlins Streetline model number HO322 which is still a $(4 digit number)
Tho Robert Tayor has on his shelf a returned up-spec one,
(Ohlins HO 201 type 46HRCS with remote reservoir and preload)
which the price could possibly be negoiated .... tho still end up being a $(4 digit number)![]()
![]()
You're so limited by Honda's cost saving, non linkage budget rear end. It sucks!
You are gonna be exceptionally lucky to get one for $(less than four digit number).
You could probably, chuck a stumpy pipe underneath, and replace the swing arm with something decent with a shock for teh same money. Not Ohlins of course, but probably just as good as a direct action Ohlins can work anyway.
Originally Posted by Jane Omorogbe from UK MSN on the KTM990SM
Now, I'm no expert.But there's very good reasons to avoid the extra complexity and mass of linkages. With direct coupled shocks there's not only fewer moving parts but there's fewer highly loaded and poorly sealed needle rollers to wear out and sieze and generally completely fuck up the relationship between the shock and rear wheel.
'Course to get the same rising-rate effect from a direct coupled item makes for a higher spec'd, more precisely controled shock valveing system. Like most KTMs. Which possibly partly explains why they're a few Kg lighter than the competition, eh? And certsainly explains why they don't have reliablility issues associated with needle rollers running in mud.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
All that is probably good on the dirt. Show me a performance bike that runs direct. Not that the Hornet matches that description, but the rear shock is SOOOOOOO bad that an upgrade is nearly a safety requirement.
On a road bike, the rising rate is more important. As is keeping the shock cooler.
Hahahaha, I deleted a bit where I made a comment about your bike being a farm bike, not a sports bike, but didn't know how you'd take it.
yeah, but the shaft still has to move through a longer stroke. So it heats up the oil and stops working quicker.
Contact Robert Taylor mate. He set me up with a beauty. Ohlins only made the fancy pants full bells and whistles jobbie specifically for the 900 Hornet.
Robert will build up the more basioc spec one to Ohlins specs set up for your weight etc.
Works a friggen treat - a massive improvement on the stock pogo stick.
Wot?
Guy wants a Ohlins for a Horny 900. Told him where to geot one. Got one told him how shit hot it is.
Well, it lives on a farm, sorta. And I guess you could call it's owner somewhat agricultural...
But it's a better machine than it's rider knows how to manage. Actually I've rarely had cause to wrinkle the seat from rear suspension performance. The front occasionally worries me.
The real advantage with a linkage setup is that you can get faster shaft movement as you load it up. That means the spring rate AND the compression valving is ramping up faster as you bottom out. That's very hard to organise with a direct couple.
I worry about shit like: If shocks were under tension, rather than compression they could be a shitload smaller and lighter.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks