Part of Society? - For Akzle

[mashman]

'Slongas you are not serially serious it's okay I guess. The serially serious seriously need to get a life!

Or a serious religion.

[Akzle]

'Slongas you are not serially serious it's okay I guess. The serially serious seriously need to get a life!

stfu, moose.

ps, see the title therr... for Akzle. me. mine. for me. woopwoop!

[BoristheBiter]

you sound like a troll.

Glad to see you have the sound turned up moose

[BoristheBiter]

stfu, moose.

ps, see the title therr... for Akzle. me. mine. for me. woopwoop!

I wouldn't be that happy about it.
It's a thread saying what a nob you are.

[Genestho]

If I had have know that all it would take is a bullet point list to get my "position" across, I would have added more examples.

Is that what I wrote? What we're doing here is formatting, FYI. It assists with meaningful communication on teh interwebs.
This is how we roll when we want to write 2000 word novels, you're welcome.

I see no reason for me to change that position. The fact that it irks you some is a bonus, but I guess that's the point of using the term. Take this discussion fr'instance. I'm not a member of your society in the green corner. Yes you are whether you like it or not in the blue corner. The blue corner herding to defend their position because it is the most commonly and socially accepted version of the argument. Baaaaaaaa I say to them. I get what he's talking about, mostly. Hopefully you'll read that as, attaining Sheepleness is contextual.

Yep, so you agree a few posts back now you just disagree again? Funny!

Actually - No. I haven't made my position clear, I've given you things to think about to test you, there's another way I think possible, that actually isn't a theory

As I said earlier, people can remain exactly the same, they don't need to change, they don't need to be pre-packaged (advertising and marketing would probably beg to differ with you). A change in "human nature" is not required for "my" utopia, so it's not barrier. Sure there will be a percentage that will say no, just as I'm here saying no to your "utopia". Take the money away and another facet of "human nature" will prevail.

Yeah "sure, a percentage will say no" because Occupy in New Zealand attracted a huge percentage of yes's, right? And on the first birthday what happened in New Zealand, last month? Zip, Zilch, Nada.

As an aside - I spent some of yesterday observing and dealing with some rather nasty facets of human nature that had nothing to do with money, really.


I maintain that human nature (disagreed) doesn't truly exist because we are individuals (agreed) and we all make choices that defy our individual "human nature". Etc
Lol, weeeeeeeeeeee circles!

I find it amusing that walls of text on a forum are frowned upon, where just about every paper, book, article etc... have walls of text explaining a "position". Granted my command of language is poor and my linking of subject matter may hop, skip and jump after a full stop and I'll do my damndest to address that, but I wouldn't hold your breath... so you can keep your pity woman. You need it more than I, baaaaaa. There's no pre-requisite for people to read it and I'll happily try to clarify where I can.

Frowned upon? Trust me, I find it amusing that you'd compare literature this way.. if you want to compare your interweb writing to a book, paper or article then write like it aye, if you wrote a book the way you wrote the "I've popped a vein" post, you won't get published, though I'm sure you're not at all seeking publication, so it matters not, it's your comparison only.

I've met a few people who have been diagnosed with some of those disorders and by using those definitions I'm sure some psychoanalyst would label me with about half of them, wrongly imho, but they are the expert and I wouldn't get a lookin because that would be denial.

Hehe

Heh, normal. There must be a definition for normal if you have a definition for OCD etc...

Oh deary me, this is pointless, at least I know it.
If you're so sure about what you preach. Get off your arse and change the world, I'll say it again; lead by example instead of freaken typing and whinging about it, don't blame money or time - when there's will there's a way, I get sick of apathy and keyboard warriors - there's some crazy advice for you!

I do not agree with your "position" or theory, although agree and have said it some where before in this quagmire that things could change, but I simply don't agree with your theory.
So thus, there's nothing more to say from me, I don't do circles.

By all means if something convinces me otherwise and I find I agree with your theory, I'll be sure to let you know.
But until then..

I will keep helping my fellow man, doing things in reality.
Have yourself a goody.

[Edbear]

stfu, moose.

ps, see the title therr... for Akzle. me. mine. for me. woopwoop!

I wouldn't be that happy about it.
It's a thread saying what a nob you are.

Subtle...

[Banditbandit]

stfu, moose.

ps, see the title therr... for Akzle. me. mine. for me. woopwoop!

Errr . the thread, which I started, had your name in the title so it grabbed your attention ... it was meant as a space for us to discuss your political/legal stance ... I believe we have done that ... and I wonder why the thread continues ... It seems to have gained a life of its own ..

[Banditbandit]

3. Logic is powerless in the face of obduracy

How in the name of all fuck, would you bloody know that?

The question is, how would I ever prove it?

I think the discussion itself proves it ... You're being obdurate Drew.

[skippa1]

"Your thread?" You do amuse us so... Methinks you take yourself far too seriously. You may be important to yourself but to some here you are merely a sideshow for amusement.

said the clown

[mashman]

If I had have know that all it would take is a bullet point list to get my "position" across, I would have added more examples.

Is that what I wrote? What we're doing here is formatting, FYI. It assists with meaningful communication on teh interwebs.
This is how we roll when we want to write 2000 word novels, you're welcome.

Frowned upon? Trust me, I find it amusing that you'd compare literature this way.. if you want to compare your interweb writing to a book, paper or article then write like it aye, if you wrote a book the way you wrote the "I've popped a vein" post, you won't get published, though I'm sure you're not at all seeking publication, so it matters not, it's your comparison only.

I'm sure it does. Some of us aren't very good at it and some frown upon that by popping a vein instead of accepting what's in front of them making the effort.

Actually - No. I haven't made my position clear, I've given you things to think about to test you, there's another way I think possible, that actually isn't a theory

Which non-theory would that be?

Yeah "sure, a percentage will say no" because Occupy in New Zealand attracted a huge percentage of yes's, right? And on the first birthday what happened in New Zealand, last month? Zip, Zilch, Nada.

As an aside - I spent some of yesterday observing and dealing with some rather nasty facets of human nature that had nothing to do with money, really.

I too was disappointed with the direction taken by Occupy, but I still admire them for what they did.

I agree that not everything has to do with money directly... but we create an environment to a budget i.e. close special needs schools, disguard the wayward kids, put people in the pressure cooker of making every cent count etc... and end up scratching our heads as to why we have a budget society.

Oh deary me, this is pointless, at least I know it.
If you're so sure about what you preach. Get off your arse and change the world, I'll say it again; lead by example instead of freaken typing and whinging about it, don't blame money or time - when there's will there's a way, I get sick of apathy and keyboard warriors - there's some crazy advice for you!

I do not agree with your "position" or theory, although agree and have said it some where before in this quagmire that things could change, but I simply don't agree with your theory.
So thus, there's nothing more to say from me, I don't do circles.

By all means if something convinces me otherwise and I find I agree with your theory, I'll be sure to let you know.
But until then..

I will keep helping my fellow man, doing things in reality
Have yourself a goody.

It's not pointless for me but I appreciate your contribution. I wish I could say that you had offered me something new to think about, but you haven't.
I'll get there.

Furry muff.

Having come from your side of the fence and having validated the arguments for that side of the fence and talked myself into the grass is greener, I'm highly unlikely to go back. No one has been able to convince me otherwise... and as I have already been on your side of the fence, I have proven that I am open to new ideas and a change of mind.

Onya lass.
You have a better one

[Akzle]

I wouldn't be that happy about it.
It's a thread saying what a nob you are.

*knob.

english not your strong point, huh?

Errr . the thread, which I started, had your name in the title so it grabbed your attention ... it was meant as a space for us to discuss your political/legal stance ... I believe we have done that ... and I wonder why the thread continues ... It seems to have gained a life of its own ..

so.. who has lawful claim to the title of the thread

[Drew]

so.. who has lawful claim to the title of the thread

Not you, our laws don't apply to you. So nothing pre owned can belong to you.

Hmmmm, where shall I come pick up my new GSX from then?

[BoristheBiter]

*knob.

english not your strong point, huh?

Maybe, maybe not, but it's better than yours.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=nob

[Akzle]

Not you, our laws don't apply to you. So nothing pre owned can belong to you.

Hmmmm, where shall I come pick up my new GSX from then?

bring new tyres. then i'll argue my point with you using my shotgun.

[Drew]

bring new tyres. then i'll argue my point with you using my shotgun.

LOL, fair enough.