Two motorcyclists dead - Wanaka region

[Coldrider]

That was all that was reported by the media. She was on the wrong side of the road when she was hit by two motorcycles. Did she not drive there ... ???

Any driver didn't ... she did.

she had lost control.

[FJRider]

The article stated she was a young inexperienced driver with no experience driving on NZ roads. So if she wasn't capable of driving, even at a slow pace on our roads, why did she attempt it?

She held a license that legally allowed her to hire ... and drive a car in New Zealand. Her great OE ..

[Coldrider]

She held a license that legally allowed her to hire ... and drive a car in New Zealand. Her great OE ..

I've hosted, american, german and japanese students, all they want to do is get about and see as much as NZ as they can stuff into their eyeballs, via any means possible.

[FJRider]

Which part of my thread said it wasn't her fault, tosser?, she is charged with careless driving.

Your confusing yourself now ... that was MY question as to if she was at fault. (you haven't answered it yet)

what the fuck is that?, she didn't deliberately drive there, she lost control, judges words. how much control she ever had is debatable, but stick to the facts, like all KB crash posts everthing is invented that isn't known, which fulls out all the crash posts.

You seem to imply she wasn't at fault because she lost control. Or was it because it wasn't deliberate ... ???

So it WAS her fault then ... ??? And which fact(s) was I not sticking too .. ???

[Coldrider]

Your confusing yourself now ... that was MY question as to if she was at fault. (you haven't answered it yet)



You seem to imply she wasn't at fault because she lost control. Or was it because it wasn't deliberate ... ???

So it WAS her fault then ... ??? And which fact(s) was I not sticking too .. ???

are you pissed. you said she had driven there, i said it was reported by the judge she had lost control at that point. as the district court has taken its case, it is about facts now, now KB shit you you are still spouting on this and every other crash thread.

[scumdog]

She slowly veered left without realising it, (well the scenery is pretty damned good) hit the gravel, over-reacted, swerved and crossed the road.

Two motorcyclist coming the other way at that point were hit by her car.

I think I have it right.

Oh, and she's sorry big-time.

[Brian d marge]

Well at the end of the day whether she meant it or not , she fked up and two possibly three bike had no escape route , whether through design of the road or their placement onn the road. Avoidable ? unavoidable ? I dont know ,
I for one will just be that extra bit more careful

Thats all

Stephen

[FJRider]

are you pissed. you said she had driven there, i said it was reported by the judge she had lost control at that point. as the district court has taken its case, it is about facts now, now KB shit you you are still spouting on this and every other crash thread.

I think it's you that's pissed ... try reading the post ... if you can read ...

My post you (miss)quoted ..

That was all that was reported by the media. She was on the wrong side of the road when she was hit by two motorcycles. Did she not drive there ... ???

Any driver didn't ... she did.

One person in the car ... in the driving seat ... makes her the driver. Or is it ... if you lose control ... you are no longer responsible for the result .. ??

[Coldrider]

Saw this one on you tube they other day, action at 1:15 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vP5cqzBkaAU

[scumdog]

Saw this one on you tube they other day, action at 1:15 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vP5cqzBkaAU

Yep, lack of attention paves the way to major fuckups eh!

SO preventable that crash...

[Coldrider]

Yep, lack of attention paves the way to major fuckups eh!

SO preventable that crash...

what was he thinking ?

[Coldrider]

I think it's you that's pissed ... try reading the post ... if you can read ...

My post you (miss)quoted ..



One person in the car ... in the driving seat ... makes her the driver. Or is it ... if you lose control ... you are no longer responsible for the result .. ??

I'm over it dot dot dot bro

[scumdog]

what was he thinking ?

'coon following too close was major problem - after Val ran up the arse of the other car.
Poor EK driver didn't have a shit-show.

[Coldrider]

'coon following too close was major problem - after Val ran up the arse of the other car.
Poor EK driver didn't have a shit-show.

yep, a waste of precious metal.

[haydes55]

If you drink and drive which results in an accident which you are at fault for, will you be charged?
You would be making a judgement to drink knowing from the outright you would be driving drunk.
How is it that driving drunk is treated worse than driving underskilled? If you can't control a car to a level which you are 100%at control 100% of the time then you are operating a machine with the knowledge that your lack of skill could result in the death of an innocent person.
Drunk, high, stupid or tired, a conscious desicion to drive should be made knowing the risks of your actions. The risk of your actions could be other peoples lives. She took the same risk as the town drunk stumbling to his car after a night on the piss. And I bet there are hundreds of people who have driven greater distances drunk and had fewer crashes than this woman.

I won't operate the shotover jet boat, i wouldn't be in total control and my actions could result in other peoples deaths. Simple, I know it sounds harsh but she is a murderer, she deserves to be treated the same as anyone else who has gotten behind the wheel unable to safely operate the vehicle, drunk, sober or speeding. Doesn't matter.