I think you are missunderstanding me and if you read some of my posts you would see that i actualy do agree with training up to a point but you can train till your blue in the face but you cant hold people's hand 24 seven to make sure they adhere to the training which is where the personal resposability comes in.
As i have said before i had personal responsibility drumed in as a kid.
When i was riding 30 miles on a friday night in the dark on a horse to get to a weekend job i new if something happened to me i was in trouble and it would be hard and take a while to find me so i took the personal responsibility to make decisions reguarding my safety.
winding up stucky since ages ago
I don't think I've referred to that particular accident at all in this thread.
If that accident were the only issue regarding quad bikes I wouldn't have even entered into the fray - (apart from perhaps calling the adults fuckwits).
I am talking specifically about the apalling mechanical state of many of New Zealand's farm bikes and what could be done to improve that standard.
I struggle to see how anyone would argue that improving the safety standard of farm bikes shouldn't be addressed.
aye & I don't disagree with you on this, as I was a heard manager & all the bikes given to us by our employers where up to standard, this was in my contract, along with that the bikes had to be cleaned every week & all service's had to be kept up to date a log book was provided etc... that happened on the last two farms..... so it is happening.....
so at the end of the day it is up to the individual in both maintenance & how they use it - not for some idiot who knows shit about it to start changing laws etc... because of a few who ignor all of the above
Greater love has no one than this, than to lay down ones life for his friends. (John 15:13)
FUck ... I had a small farm in the North Island hill country ... and a couple of quads on it ... a loaded tank on the rear makes it a very different proposition to a front mounted tank ... I'd prefer it on the front to keep that end of the bike down when going up hills ...
Are you hinting at reversing up the hill ?
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
I was working on a dairy farm in bell block in 84 and refused to ride the farmbike anymore because it had no brakes and kept jumping out of gear, and there was some pretty good hills. Got kicked off the property at 11pm at night. Was a fucking long walk that night. Actually he gave me the option of walking to get the cows or fucking off, I said I would walk, but he told me to fuck off anyway.![]()
For a man is a slave to whatever has mastered him.Keep an open mind, just dont let your brains fall out.
For a man is a slave to whatever has mastered him.Keep an open mind, just dont let your brains fall out.
Maybe I'm just a paranoid share milker but I'd hate to see what osh and the labour department would do to me if my worker had an accident on one of my bikes and it wasn't up to scratch. They all get training and specifically instructed not to ride any if the bike has not got everything working properly. Plus limited to a top speed of 30kph
Not that that stopped the ball joint snapping while I was going round a corner a while back, some things you cant prepare for and unfortunately you also cant regulate for stupidity (as much as the government seems to try)
The way the system works, is that if there is an incident then you have failed in your duty, No matter what level you have been working at or what systems you have in place, the incident itself is proof of a failure to take all practicable steps to ensure the safety of your workers.
You may get nothing, a formal warning or a trip into court, where it will be on you to prove that you were doing everything you were able to do to meet your legal requirements (even though you failed to do so as proven by the incident...in there eyes.) You can have all the maintenance systems in place, and yet a mechanical failure shows you weren't doing enough. Hence the crippling of some workplaces trying to attain an undefined, vague and imo unattainable criteria.
I'm not defending it, I consider it a poor if not incompetent and lazy stance from the power that be, There should be a defined minimum standard to work to, Instead they just tell you it better not go wrong, and if it does, You're at fault. No matter what you have in place.
Rememeber if its not written down (and signed by all parties) it doesn't exsist.
Also the report into the pike river mine disaster report highlights what can happen when the system ignores the concept of a minimum standard and just insists each work places does what they see fit to reach compliance.
Not helped by the fact that the DOL were prepared to see people die before they looked into it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks