View Poll Results: Which is Heaver Teezees Beast or the Grifiths Bros SideCar

Voters
21. You may not vote on this poll
  • Sidecar by 2 kg

    2 9.52%
  • Sidecar by 5 kg

    4 19.05%
  • Sidecar by 10kg

    4 19.05%
  • The Beast by 2 kg

    5 23.81%
  • The Beast by 5 kg

    5 23.81%
  • The Beast by 10 kg

    1 4.76%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 95 of 458 FirstFirst ... 45859394959697105145195 ... LastLast
Results 1,411 to 1,425 of 6865

Thread: ESE's works engine tuner

  1. #1411
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/GasGas/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    21,186
    Blog Entries
    2
    Funny usually the first runs are the best until the crankcase warms up. I always run through gears a few times before taking any real note of readings.
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

  2. #1412
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,516
    .

    It was suggested at the time that the pipe was a little long for the porting and as it heated up it mached it better. Possible I guess.

    .

  3. #1413
    Join Date
    18th October 2007 - 08:20
    Bike
    1970 Vespa ss90
    Location
    Schδrding
    Posts
    1,831
    F5dave makes a good point, there is always a "slightly better" run when the engine is warming up, and once it is up to N.O.T, the runs remain constant. (always good for the customer who want's to beat his mates), of course until the engine gets too hot, when it drops dramatically.

    With the pipe temperature I have actually seen 3 pipes that work really well (older designs) but, lets say you where racing in a 20 lap race they actually gradually overheat the engine and sometimes actually seize, (or worse and hole a piston) whereas in a 12 lap race, they work fine.

    You notice it late in the race, when for no apparent reason the EGT starts slowly climbing.

    To be honest I really have not been able to put a real reason to this happening, but notice that it's the stinger (pipe "bleed valve") that seems to be the cause.

    Not so much the diameter, as I suspected, but more the design of the muffler.

    For example, the "modern" 2 stroke muffler hasn't changed since the eighties, and there seems good reason other than styling, the older style (that you see in older books) effectively muffle the exhaust, but it seems does cause the pipe to overheat (in longer races)

    Like you say Teezee, your pipe could well be too long, or even, you may just need to take a look at you stinger design, not so much the muffler, (as you have a modern design), but more the diameter and perhaps length.

    I simply use the old technique of having the stinger section as a "sliding joint", and where the stinger meets the baffle cone, instead of welding it in place (for testing) simply have a screw clamp joint, so you can slide a (longer, or indeed, shorter) stinger section in and out of the baffle cone.

    You can find power this way (surprisingly), and you will instantly lose noise!

    Just don't go past the medium point of reflection!

    There are plenty of two stroke exhaust now that essentially have the muffler attached straight to the baffle cone, and the stinger section (that what does not include the muffler portion) is simply "slid inside" the baffle cone.

  4. #1414
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,516
    .

    Interesting SS90, a lot to think about there. Currently my muffler is an old one of an RG250 that has had the crud burnt out of it a typical Bucket muffler. I recently acquired of Trademe two very near new mufflers from 125 MX bikes. I figured they would be a better design than I could make myself.

    Apparently the customers wanted a better sound????? suits me, I want a quiet Bucket, which is better for sneaking up on the competition with. I have found, if they don’t know your there you stand a much better chance of diving under them into the next corner.

    Speedpro also recently talked to me about people slipping the stinger inside the chamber. My new mufflers have different stinger diameters so I should be able to try your suggestion.

    I want to make a new pipe, actually several straight pipes with sliding mid sections for testing on the dyno like I saw in an attachment you posted. I could also incorporate a sliding stinger as well, in fact that’s a very good idea, thanks.

    There is a lot of work in planning the chambers and making them so it wont happen overnight but it will be worth the effort. I have spent nearly 100 hours building a new motor to try the “unmasking of the transfers” “port/time/area” and larger “inlet port” ideas of breathing better and for the right time talked about before, a lot of work for just a little more torque!!!!.

    .

  5. #1415
    Join Date
    18th October 2007 - 08:20
    Bike
    1970 Vespa ss90
    Location
    Schδrding
    Posts
    1,831
    Yea, I can relate to that.

    The big gains are the easy ones, and the stuff that "sets you engine apart from others" takes time, but it all adds up.

    20PS is really good though, and like you say, getting it at lower RPM is what it is all about.

    It helps your sanity when you think about any gains in a %age of your base run.

    1 PS (or 1NM) becomes a bigger number when you think of it that way!

  6. #1416
    Join Date
    23rd January 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    ninja 250
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    5,024
    Quote Originally Posted by TZ350 View Post
    .

    Interesting SS90, a lot to think about there. Currently my muffler is an old one of an RG250 that has had the crud burnt out of it a typical Bucket muffler. I recently acquired of Trademe two very near new mufflers from 125 MX bikes. I figured they would be a better design than I could make myself.

    .
    Wonder what these would be like? $89- each.
    http://www.trademe.co.nz/Trade-Me-Mo...-247170189.htm

  7. #1417
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,516
    .

    A while ago Thomas told me that if I wanted more power the pipe had to be made longer. Well like most, I new that a pipe needed to be shorter the higher the RPM and thought he was wrong.

    And I have always been curious about why someone at Buckets was able to run an RS125 pipe on their TS125, I couldn’t understand how a pipe for a high rev high power motor could work so well on a low rpm 18hp bike.

    Recently I wrote a spread sheet based on Blairs work so I could sort out a pipe for my new engine. What I didn’t realize is that a pipe needed to be longer for higher Hp engines because of the higher average exhaust gas temperature. So a pipe gets shorter as the rev’s go up and longer as the hp increases.

    Here I have graphed the tuned length as a function of Hp vis RPM for an Ex port duration of 198 degrees.

    ……….….18hp…….20hp……..22hp……..37hp
    RPM
    ..9,000……917…….1005…….1085….. Tuned length in mm
    ..9,500……868……..952……..1028
    10,000…..825……….904………977
    10,500…..786……….861………930
    11,000…..750……….822………888
    11,500……717…….…786………849
    12,000……688…….…754………814……..840 Honda RS125
    12,500……660….……723………782

    Ex Temp…350………475………600……...650 average exhaust temp Oc
    BMEP……5bar………8bar……..9bar……..11bar

    It makes sense that a pipe gets shorter as the rev’s go up because there is less time for the pressure wave to travel out and back through the pipe.

    Hp and Ex Temp are functions of BMEP the higher the BMEP the higher the measured Hp and hotter the average exhaust temperature is.

    A pressure wave travels faster in a hotter exhaust so the more hp the motor makes the longer the tuned length needs to be. It was a surprise to me that a Honda RS125 pipe with a tuned length of 840mm could be used on a 9,750rpm 18hp TS125.

    Exhaust port duration also has an effect on the tuned length. Keeping the Hp and RPM the same I graphed the change in tuned length for a range of exhaust port duration’s.

    Ex Opens ATDC Duration Tuned Length

    …….87………...……186…....….943
    …….85…………...…190....…….964
    …….83…...…………194…....….984
    …….81……...………198…......1004
    …….79………...……202…......1024

    And that makes sense too as the longer duration means more time so the pressure pulse can travel further.

    So there it is:- more rev’s and the pipe becomes shorter, more power and/or duration and the pipe becomes longer. Not what I had thought at all.

    So Thomas was right, a pipe needs to be relatively longer for a motor that is making more Hp.

    .

  8. #1418
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,516
    Quote Originally Posted by gav View Post
    Wonder what these would be like? $89- each.
    http://www.trademe.co.nz/Trade-Me-Mo...-247170189.htm
    Tempting, certainly worth a look.

    .

  9. #1419
    Join Date
    18th October 2007 - 08:20
    Bike
    1970 Vespa ss90
    Location
    Schδrding
    Posts
    1,831
    As a sidetrack,

    These 2 pictures arrived today, I'm not 100% sure, but the cylinders are off a Yamaha from the early eighties belonging either to Johler Harald or Emmerich Stenger.

    Evidently this engine was (apparently) faster than Anton Mang's Kwaka, but I havn't seen any evidence of that.

    I imagine that ring life would be somewhat "short".

    There are some pretty harsh marks on the bore directly above the transfers, I would surmise that is due to the "boost channels".

    I'm 100% sure that it would have any gains, but it seems it may have.

    I wonder if Boysen started off with this concept before ending up with the transfer boost's we know today?

  10. #1420
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/GasGas/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    21,186
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quite a torturous path to follow for the boosts, but no more so than as an extn of the 2ndrys as per Suzuki of the era (late 70s). That must have been from a TZ500 where they were still running piston port rather than reed hence couldn't run normal boost port. Early 80s? More late 70s. But they kept with the piston port engines a they made more power than reed at the time. No sign of powervalve but there is a ex boost port. Sidecars kept these going somewhile longer where the high output was important & the peaky nature not so with many spin off engines from Dutch tuners (memory failing Henkel or Heiniken or something, it will come to me). [edit Krauser was one). When did they start with electrofusion over chrome? that may id the cylinder a bit.

    Must have run a single ring peg centrally.
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

  11. #1421
    Join Date
    18th May 2007 - 20:23
    Bike
    RG50 and 76 Suzuki GP125 Buckets
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    10,516
    Quote Originally Posted by SS90 View Post
    These 2 pictures arrived today, I'm not 100% sure, but the cylinders are off a Yamaha from the early eighties belonging either to Johler Harald or Emmerich Stenger.
    Thanks, very interesting pictures, very radical, what I love is, its the sort of thing that can be tried on a bucket. I am impressed.

    .

  12. #1422
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/GasGas/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    21,186
    Blog Entries
    2
    Ohh look, my Yamaha factory & Production road racing 2 stroke 1955-93 book has just today arrived from Amazon (along with Cameron's Grand Prix Motorcycle book). So I might be able to anorak an answer after a few nights.
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

  13. #1423
    Join Date
    4th November 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    BSA A10
    Location
    Rangiora
    Posts
    12,814
    Quote Originally Posted by F5 Dave View Post
    Sidecars kept these going somewhile longer where the high output was important & the peaky nature not so with many spin off engines from Dutch tuners (memory failing Henkel or Heiniken or something, it will come to me). [edit Krauser was one).

    Hummel? although I think he just did tuning or maybe his own barrels for TZ based stuff

    Krauser, ADM, BRM, Swissauto http://www.flickr.com/photos/teamher...7594371961909/
    "If you can make black marks on a straight from the time you turn out of a corner until the braking point of the next turn, then you have enough power."


    Quote Originally Posted by scracha View Post
    Even BP would shy away from cleaning up a sidecar oil spill.
    Quote Originally Posted by Warren Zevon
    Send Lawyers, guns and money, the shit has hit the fan

  14. #1424
    Join Date
    14th June 2009 - 15:13
    Bike
    suzuki
    Location
    europe
    Posts
    176
    Quote Originally Posted by TZ350 View Post
    .

    A while ago Thomas told me that if I wanted more power the pipe had to be made longer. Well like most, I new that a pipe needed to be shorter the higher the RPM and thought he was wrong.

    And I have always been curious about why someone at Buckets was able to run an RS125 pipe on their TS125, I couldn’t understand how a pipe for a high rev high power motor could work so well on a low rpm 18hp bike.

    Recently I wrote a spread sheet based on Blairs work so I could sort out a pipe for my new engine. What I didn’t realize is that a pipe needed to be longer for higher Hp engines because of the higher average exhaust gas temperature. So a pipe gets shorter as the rev’s go up and longer as the hp increases.

    Here I have graphed the tuned length as a function of Hp vis RPM for an Ex port duration of 198 degrees.

    ……….….18hp…….20hp……..22hp……..37hp
    RPM
    ..9,000……917…….1005…….1085….. Tuned length in mm
    ..9,500……868……..952……..1028
    10,000…..825……….904………977
    10,500…..786……….861………930
    11,000…..750……….822………888
    11,500……717…….…786………849
    12,000……688…….…754………814……..840 Honda RS125
    12,500……660….……723………782

    Ex Temp…350………475………600……...650 average exhaust temp Oc
    BMEP……5bar………8bar……..9bar……..11bar

    It makes sense that a pipe gets shorter as the rev’s go up because there is less time for the pressure wave to travel out and back through the pipe.

    Hp and Ex Temp are functions of BMEP the higher the BMEP the higher the measured Hp and hotter the average exhaust temperature is.

    A pressure wave travels faster in a hotter exhaust so the more hp the motor makes the longer the tuned length needs to be. It was a surprise to me that a Honda RS125 pipe with a tuned length of 840mm could be used on a 9,750rpm 18hp TS125.

    Exhaust port duration also has an effect on the tuned length. Keeping the Hp and RPM the same I graphed the change in tuned length for a range of exhaust port duration’s.

    Ex Opens ATDC Duration Tuned Length

    …….87………...……186…....….943
    …….85…………...…190....…….964
    …….83…...…………194…....….984
    …….81……...………198…......1004
    …….79………...……202…......1024

    And that makes sense too as the longer duration means more time so the pressure pulse can travel further.

    So there it is:- more rev’s and the pipe becomes shorter, more power and/or duration and the pipe becomes longer. Not what I had thought at all.

    So Thomas was right, a pipe needs to be relatively longer for a motor that is making more Hp.

    .
    Pipe length and exhaust duration are certainly the most critical factors in determining the peak power speed. Another important factor is ignition timing. Most modern two-strokes are running ignition timings of less than 10 degrees at peak power speed. Your typical bucket racer might be on 20 degrees. This alters the exhaust gas temperature with the more retarded timing having the higher exhaust gas temp and thus peak revs are higher.

  15. #1425
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/GasGas/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    21,186
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Kickaha View Post
    Hummel? although I think he just did tuning or maybe his own barrels for TZ based stuff

    Krauser, ADM, BRM, Swissauto http://www.flickr.com/photos/teamher...7594371961909/
    I thought I'd seen Hans Hummel barrels (note that pic of Krauser has HH marked on barrels). Sounds Dutch. Oops he's Austrian.

    Either way I'm clearly no expert on the subject & someone is likely to come along & point out that the barrels are from a Griffen 360 marine compressor.
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •