DLNA is good for all that stuff. Can stream fullHD across the existing wirelss network, no need for super expensive long HDMI cables or fucking about with routing wires.
DLNA is good for all that stuff. Can stream fullHD across the existing wirelss network, no need for super expensive long HDMI cables or fucking about with routing wires.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
I don't fuck about with wires, I wired the whole thing up top to bottom with CAT6 when I moved in
A 300GB plan doesn't necessarily have to cost much more than a 40GB plan. It's just that most ISPs in NZ are a blatant con, but there are a few which have reasonable deals. The NZ public think that bandwidth is a very rare, precious resource which we must only use in moderation or it will run out. That's the excuse the ISPs have been using for years to rip ignorant fools off into paying exorbitant sums of money for plans with pathetically small data caps.
It's not the same as a console tho, console tends to be a "better experience", there's even a study out there to back it up (like going to the stadium vs watching on TV for sports)
Also some games lose what made them awesome when they "upgrade" silent hill is perfect case in point, that which made it scary is lost with enhanced GFX because they were playing to a limit & everything was built round that limit. Not everything is better "enhanced"
Thats the way to do it
Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance"Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
I call bullshit. A PC can easily be connected to a TV via HDMI, and there are numerous gamepads available. MS has even released an XBOX360 kit for PC, which includes a wireless USB adapter and a normal XBOX360 controller connects to it. That can replicate the console experience quite nicely, but with the potential for much better graphics.
So you suck at using a controller then I take it
And a TV feed will show you more of the game then being at the stadium, but it's not the same is it?
I don't know what it is maybee like with silent hill it's the over "enhancing" of games that spoil it but it came out people had more fun playing consoles. People are also happier to watch someone play console than they are to watch someone play PC regardless of screen size (all tests were done on same screen & brainwaves monitored)
PC's can be good for the eyes tho, another study shows FPS games on PC can actually improve eye sight (so much for "you'll ruin your eyes") but the catch is, you must play on CRT
Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance"Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk
Is fine for racing games or rpg ones you don't need to aim (I use it on my computer as I prefer it for most of these) but FPS is way to difficult with rate aim control, so much so if I wanted to get into FPS on console I'd buy a mouse adapter for it (though these are tricky as a lot get caught by aimbot type detectors).
Not really an apt comparison, on one hand you have something on screen, the other is something irl; but in this case you have something on screen vs something on a higher definition screen with better graphics. Maybe TV vs Cinema is a better comparison?
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks