Thread removed

[Scouse]

No he never did Steve it was all bullshit.

Is this my crazy namesake good to have you back buddy

[Drew]

Yeah we know each other Drew and your right that's what you said the first time we met oh how thing never change.

Are you still shagging that tranny.

I shagged a trannie?

Hmmm.

[Mental Trousers]

Is this my crazy namesake good to have you back buddy

Won't be for long though mate.

[RobGassit]

Hurry up with your posts guy's. This thread is about to be removed..

[scrivy]

I shagged a trannie?

Hmmm.

I think the correct answer would have been 'I was shagged by a trannie....' ,Drew.

[nodrog:Me]

Choice
___________

[Billy]

Surely the cheapest most effective method would be to ask at briefing "hands up anyone that got on the piss last night" anyone that puts their hand up is excluded from the meeting immediately, anyone that dosent, isint. Simple, inexpensive & duty of care carried out.
This is from the same guy that suggested that my kid's school should let seniors & juniors out 5 minutes apart to save 250k on building a new bigger pick up & drop off zone.

Err,Yeah,I guess we could try...But

[Billy]

Are you accusing me of being a "Anti MNZ Activist?"

Not at all,Don't see how you worked that out,Time to let it go now Morris.

[Crasherfromwayback]

I shagged a trannie?

Shagging your brother is sick mate.

[GrayWolf]

Sadly it's to late to turn back the clock now and as it has been aired in the public arena,MNZ now have a duty of care to follow up on the issue presented,

I have been informed this morning that action will begin as soon as the necessary equipment can be purchased and an official suitably trained in the required area,Of course there will be a cost and that will have to be passed on to members.

Of course as I mentioned earlier,We already had the matter in hand and were working on a more affordable option in the way of a contractor,Unfortunately this may no longer meet the needs of any coronial inquests we may have to attend in the future

Hi Billy,
just a thought re 'testing' I work in a heavy industry which is Safety Critical (level1)... we have just introduced random drug/alcohol testing, however there was an existing policy of testing for ANY incident of the staff involved in an incident... an outside contractor performs this, and it is perfectly acceptable, even in the event of a Serious accident, or death involved in an incident. I dont see how if the testing is performed by a recognised contractor it would not be accepted at an inquest.
Random testing has a powerful effect in many ways.

[Drew]

Shagging your brother is sick mate.

I know.

I am amazed daily, that either of them get laid.

[sidecar bob]

Err,Yeah,I guess we could try...But

We just need to add a statment to the duty of care, saying that if any competitor or team member believes that they are currently temporaraly physically or mentally impaired, in any way that may affect their judgment, that they should not take part in the meeting.
This also covers things like the flu, and depression etc, for riders & supporters.

[Drew]

We just need to add a statment to the duty of care, saying that if any competitor or team member believes that they are currently temporaraly physically or mentally impaired, in any way that may affect their judgment, that they should not take part in the meeting.
This also covers things like the flu, and depression etc, for riders & supporters.

Dunno if it would be seen as 'actively working toward' drug and alcohol free racing though.

Safety regulations these days are worded non specifically, very deliberately so that should someone get hurt, a finger can be pointed nearly always.

[RobGassit]

I thought Jelly already was the independant contractor for all testing, and he does it for nothing. I doubt you would find anyone more dedicated.

[jellywrestler]

I thought Jelly already was the independant contractor for all testing, and he does it for nothing. I doubt you would find anyone more dedicated.

I can't deny my commitment in that area...