It would depend on the size of her knockers wouldn't it? Not trying to be sexist or anything.
It would depend on the size of her knockers wouldn't it? Not trying to be sexist or anything.
Yamaha are definitely giving Harley-Davidson a "run for their money" with the release of the new 1900cc Raider SCL. Compare that to the 1800cc H-D CVO Breakout:
Never Take Life Seriously - Nobody Gets Out Alive Anyway!
2013 Yamaha Raider SCL - US MSRP Price: $19,990
2013 Harley-Davidson FXSBSE CVO Breakout - US MSRP Price: $26,499
Never Take Life Seriously - Nobody Gets Out Alive Anyway!
Fixed for ya.
You see a cruiser relys on having lots of low end torque... tis the nature of the beast.
Triumph figured out that by increasing the firing order to 270 degs they could increase the Torque figures dramatically. They did this even though the 865cc speedmaster and america, actually lost almost 11HP. compared to the bonnie and thruxton, (same engine).
However this gives the preferred acceleration and "Low end" that the cruisers needed to deal with the extra weight........ Hmmmmmmm
The sound it made and the V-twin characteristics, were probably on their mind. but your suggestion is simply wrong. they didnt use the firing order with the 270 crank to simply mimick the V-twin. sorry just needed more torque.
Originally Posted by Billy Connolly
Will have the new Bolt in shop in approx 2 weeks time, will have an R as the demo (In Canberra)
If you're not living on the edge you're not leaning over far enough
Ok love the look of the bike..the only thing that spoils it for me..are the stupidly small header pipes looks like they came off a morris minor
if you are gonna make it look tuff why not give it some man sized header pipes
if you think life is 2 short , get a taller one
Fatboy Racing
yamahawk racing enterprizes
IM DAM SEXY racing
Yes um. The torque figures bear you out but, I just had a look see at the TDM's, well ahead of this game since the mid 90's. The MKI is renowned for it's bottom end & pull, the MKII & the 900 both, are a bit snatchy & possibly badly fueled as standard at the bottom end. Less tug as it were. The latter both 270 degree cranks. More to it I suspect.
Just musing, don't beat an ignorant man.
Manopausal.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks