
Originally Posted by
Robert Taylor
Sorry about that but I don't agree for one second! We developed something last year in NZ ''production racing'' ( which is largely what it is here, production based ) and passed the info on to the engineers at the Ohlins factory. It is now being used in a number of Moto 2 and second tier ( CRT ) MotoGP bikes. As Ohlins have the engineering capacity and some pretty sophisticated equipment it will be refined and developed further. From that same idea we have applied to a couple of roadbikes more recently, with excellent results.
Within the rules you keep developing, that's the nature of engineering. If there is a spin off for the average man in the street then that's a bonus
There isn't anywhere else to develop stuff in this country is the problem. It's all production based except for the 125GP/Moto3 type bikes so we don't have much choice.
Besides, you fiddling with existing equipment and refining things with new tweaks or different components isn't developing new gear.

Originally Posted by
Robert Taylor
Yes, some of what you say is plausible but there should always be formulae where engineering development is given a relatively free hand. To those of us with an engineering bent watching Formula 1 and Americas cup is much more than about the sheer racing spectacle itself. The technology behind it is fascinating. Right below such formulae there are the more cost controlled classes that people in numbers can subscribe to.
Now when we win the Americas cup lets think outside of the square, it doesn't have to go to Auckland.........
I've always liked the America's Cup once they got on the water. Off the water it's bullshit, but on the water it's all technology, sailing skill and tactics, like it should be.
Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
Bookmarks