So he's apparently angry that she's upset because he chose to walk down her street ("not his usual route" - I do hope the media report didn't intend that as a pun) because he has every right to walk wherever he likes.
Interesting that he was also quoted as saying "I got over it, she should too"
Yesterday, Crofts said he lived four blocks from the woman and had every right to walk down the street.
He had been returning from his father's house and, though it was not his usual route, he had done nothing wrong.
There was "no particular reason" he had chosen to walk down that street, he said. As he was walking past the woman's house, her neighbour had called out to him. He had said hello to the neighbour, but he did not stop at the end of her driveway, he said.
"It's been eight years - it's in the past. It's a public area and it's my right to walk down the street. I don't want anything to do with her. I got over it; she needs to get over it, too."
Strange how the perpetrator seems to think that because he's put it behind him his victim is the one with the problem.
Originally Posted by Katman
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks