The fascist regime that made you a moron: Thanks dJonkey

**husaberg** · 12th July 2015, 18:55

Originally Posted by Brian d marge

True , but is it one rule for all , or just when you fellas have trouble ?

Stephen

Remember you were going to answer some questions for me Stephen you know answers not a documentary on what you are doing in your daily life in Japan.

Originally Posted by Brian d marge

I think ive answered them

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

You have not given your source of that information. Still waiting
You have not answered why it was your source would use the information from the 1948 figures when now as then it was known to be based on 1938 figures. Still waiting
Nor have you answered why would they use the 1949 figures when it is known to be based on data collected after the war.Still waiting
You have also not answered why the tapes and transcripts of the prisoner conversations in cells secretly recorded can be dismissed as being incorrect. Still waiting
Nor have you answered why the exact figure of those killed is so important to the denial camp. Still waiting
So where did all the prisoners that we know arrived by train to the camps go. Did they disappear like smoke.Still waiting

**bogan** · 12th July 2015, 19:02

Originally Posted by Brian d marge

True , but is it one rule for all , or just when you fellas have trouble ?

Stephen

No. It is according to ability, this is why every reply to you is not pulling you up on grammar issues. Yet if I relaxed mine down to your standard, I would expect to be pulled up on it a lot.

This is perhaps why quoting yourself is not as good an option as simply answering some basic questions that are put to you so your position or evidence or logic can be clarified.

The sharing of information in a debate is a simple concept, and the failure of conspiracy theorists to adhere to it is why you are shunned; it has little to do with what you think, but so much to do with why you think it (illogically). Which is of course not to say everyone who thinks as the 'official line' does so logically, but a lot do; others just tend to follow, perhaps based on this logic they have seen employed before...

**Brian d marge** · 12th July 2015, 19:23

See post 2234
I think Ive made my position clear and some good info in that forum

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

**bogan** · 12th July 2015, 19:31

Originally Posted by Brian d marge

See post 2234
I think Ive made my position clear and some good info in that forum

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Seen it, still didn't explain the hullabaloo about zionism.

Forum link is just more of your lazy arse 'read this shit until you agree with me' style of debate.

Like I said, it isn't what you believe that gets you shunned, just the illogicality in which you reached those beliefs.

**Brian d marge** · 12th July 2015, 20:22

Originally Posted by bogan

Seen it, still didn't explain the hullabaloo about zionism.

Forum link is just more of your lazy arse 'read this shit until you agree with me' style of debate.

Like I said, it isn't what you believe that gets you shunned, just the illogicality in which you reached those beliefs.

who has been shunned .... not feeling the love are you?

That link as you quite astutely observed aint nothing to do with Zionism ...never said it was ...

That be a whole different link ..

As for illogicality ..hands up on that , When I said post 1 ...I didnt expect anyone to go back to the beginning of the whole forum .... Ya got me on that one

anymore questions ?

Stephen

**husaberg** · 12th July 2015, 20:24

Originally Posted by Brian d marge

anymore questions ?

Originally Posted by Brian d marge

And

Oh noes using a well and trusted jewish almanac
We find the population went down by 2/5th of fk all . . But hang werent 90 % wiped out 6 mill at least

More hang on . Something need chips to go with this fishy

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Stephen

You have not given your source of that information. Still waiting what website this was gleaned from
You have not answered why it was your source would use the information from the 1948 figures when now as then it was known to be based on 1938 figures. Still waiting
Nor have you answered why would they use the 1949 figures when it is known to be based on data collected after the war.Still waiting
You have also not answered why the tapes and transcripts of the prisoner conversations in cells secretly recorded can be dismissed as being incorrect. Still waiting
Nor have you answered why the exact figure of those killed is so important to the denial camp. Still waiting
So where did all the prisoners that we know arrived by train to the camps go. Did they disappear like smoke.Still waiting

**bogan** · 12th July 2015, 20:30

Originally Posted by Brian d marge

who has been shunned .... not feeling the love are you?

That link as you quite astutely observed aint nothing to do with Zionism ...never said it was ...

That be a whole different link ..

As for illogicality ..hands up on that , When I said post 1 ...I didnt expect anyone to go back to the beginning of the whole forum .... Ya got me on that one

anymore questions ?

Stephen

I was quite clear in my assertions about who was shunned. How can you not get that?

So why refer me to a place that has nothing to do with what we are debating?

Well if there is two post 1s in a thread, it's news to me.

Nothing new because you are still completely failing to answer those that have already been given to you.

**Brian d marge** · 12th July 2015, 20:33

Originally Posted by husaberg

You have not given your source of that information. Still waiting what website this was gleaned from
You have not answered why it was your source would use the information from the 1948 figures when now as then it was known to be based on 1938 figures. Still waiting
Nor have you answered why would they use the 1949 figures when it is known to be based on data collected after the war.Still waiting
You have also not answered why the tapes and transcripts of the prisoner conversations in cells secretly recorded can be dismissed as being incorrect. Still waiting
Nor have you answered why the exact figure of those killed is so important to the denial camp. Still waiting
So where did all the prisoners that we know arrived by train to the camps go. Did they disappear like smoke.Still waiting

You might want to get a cup of coffee , them your questions and the answers will be in that Forum , ( seems legit, so far , to me )
As Im pretty sure , You havent understood, my position or indeed what Ive said , So off you go to post 2234 , the big long one, and in red ,,, lies your answer . ( IF you want a more in depth answer , I refer you to the forum ...they have really been at it , in a neutral stance as far as I can see )

Stephen.

**husaberg** · 12th July 2015, 20:36

Originally Posted by Brian d marge

You might want to get a cup of coffee , them your questions and the answers will be in that Forum , ( seems legit, so far , to me )
As Im pretty sure , You havent understood, my position or indeed what Ive said , So off you go to post 2234 , the big long one, and in red ,,, lies your answer . ( IF you want a more in depth answer , I refer you to the forum ...they have really been at it , in a neutral stance as far as I can see )

Stephen.

No Stephen the time has come to put out or pull out as your position is a little skewed. Maybe less self medication with the Rohypnol.
In case you forget while you brew your own coffee (made with free trade beans.)

Originally Posted by Brian d marge

We find the population went down by 2/5th of fk all . . But hang werent 90 % wiped out 6 mill at least

You have not given your source of that information. Still waiting what website this was gleaned from
You have not answered why it was your source would use the information from the 1948 figures when now as then it was known to be based on 1938 figures. Still waiting
Nor have you answered why would they use the 1949 figures when it is known to be based on data collected after the war.Still waiting
You have also not answered why the tapes and transcripts of the prisoner conversations in cells secretly recorded can be dismissed as being incorrect. Still waiting
Nor have you answered why the exact figure of those killed is so important to the denial camp. Still waiting
So where did all the prisoners that we know arrived by train to the camps go. Did they disappear like smoke.Still waiting

**Katman** · 12th July 2015, 20:44

Meanwhile post #2210 goes conspicuously ignored.

**Brian d marge** · 12th July 2015, 20:46

Originally Posted by bogan

I was quite clear in my assertions about who was shunned. How can you not get that?

So why refer me to a place that has nothing to do with what we are debating?

Well if there is two post 1s in a thread, it's news to me.

Nothing new because you are still completely failing to answer those that have already been given to you.

Yup , sorry I just dont know how to answer , completely lost for words

All I can say is , go back to post 2234 ( my one the long one) read that. The link under that is all about THAT topic

IF you are on about Zionism , it IS linked to post 2234

here is a start .https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionism

drop down to 8.4 ....

**husaberg** · 12th July 2015, 20:46

Originally Posted by Katman

Meanwhile post #2210 goes conspicuously ignored.

2212 answered it with an actual answer, I Know you are unfamiliar with those. SFB.

Picking Stephen is never going to answer as it makes him looks pretty hypocritical for posting a few of his replies.

**bogan** · 12th July 2015, 20:55

Originally Posted by Brian d marge

Yup , sorry I just dont know how to answer , completely lost for words

All I can say is , go back to post 2234 ( my one the long one) read that. The link under that is all about THAT topic

IF you are on about Zionism , it IS linked to post 2234

here is a start .https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionism

drop down to 8.4 ....

You're not listening stephen. My question is why does it matter if one is a zionist given that not all zionists are bad people (by your own assertion). A large proposition of religions have various parts of scripture that can be held up as justification by bad men to do bad things; I'm not saying there is none of that in zionism.

What I want to know is why it matters so much is somebody is zionist, or jewish; and do you consider that to be a bad thing? (even just answering this last bit with a simple yes/no would be a great improvement from you current evasionary tactics).