The fascist regime that made you a moron: Thanks dJonkey

[bogan]

Post1 is not about gcsb I not sure which post one you are reading

Try the big black letters at the bottom


Finally
Yes and then no

The the last 2 questions

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Post 1, as in the first post in the thread.

So if all zionists are not bad people, why does it matter if they are a zionist or not?

[Brian d marge]

Stop dodging the burden of Proof - Either submit your sources for Peer Review or stop making Baseless Claims.

Havent made any claims
I just raised the point that you could be wrong
Simple
And it wasnt difficult to do
which then raised the issue of you may not know what your talking about




Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

[Brian d marge]

Post 1, as in the first post in the thread.

So if all zionists are not bad people, why does it matter if they are a zionist or not?

I simply dont know what to say


Yes to the second question

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

[bogan]

I simply dont know what to say


Yes to the second question

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

We've noticed.

Yes is not an acceptable answer to a question of 'why'.

[TheDemonLord]

Havent made any claims
I just raised the point that you could be wrong
Simple
And it wasnt difficult to do
which then raised the issue of you may not know what your talking about




Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

let me make it Clear:

Saying this:

I just raised the point that you could be wrong

That is a Claim.

It was made without Evidence.

[Katman]

I simply dont know what to say

You may be confusing this thread with the 'USA and Israel' one.

[Brian d marge]

let me make it Clear:

Saying this:



That is a Claim.

It was made without Evidence.

No its not
And i even gave you the quote the ss guard said a direct quote with reference

Your wasting both mine and your time

Try harder

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

[Brian d marge]

You may be confusing this thread with the 'USA and Israel' one.

No I was lost for words

As simple as that

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

[Brian d marge]

We've noticed.

Yes is not an acceptable answer to a question of 'why'.

True but all other methods have failed

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

[bogan]

True but all other methods have failed

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Not all, not by a long shot.

That is a Claim.

It was made without Evidence.

[TheDemonLord]

Your argument consists of nothing more than "someone told me these marks were made by dying Jews so that's what they must be".

BTW - Thanks for the positive Rep, It makes a change from your usual Tactic....

Okay.

What else could they be?

Could they be caused by an Industrial or Construction process? No, otherwise we would see marks like these on other concrete structures
Could they be caused by decay or the ravages of Time? No, otherwise we would see marks like these on other Concrete structures that are left over from World War 2
Could they be caused by Day-to-day usage of the structure? No, assuming that the structure isn't a Gas Chamber and has an innocent purpose - we would expect to see similar marks in similar structures as a result of day-to-day usage - we don't
Could they be caused by Animals? No, Animals don't care unless there is something to gain (food, Shelter etc.) or they are marking territory - yet the only animals of a big enough size to scratch in concrete don't live in Germany any more and if it were marking territory, we would expect to see them at a consistent height

The theory that they are made by the dieing, desperate people trying to escape their fate, when backed up with the other evidence (you know, all that Evidence that you haven't refuted yet) makes it the most plausible explanation.

However, if you have a competing theory - let me know your theory and submit your supporting evidence.

So Katman - what else could it be?

[TheDemonLord]

No its not
And i even gave you the quote the ss guard said a direct quote with reference

Your wasting both mine and your time

Try harder

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

You gave a conflicting viewpoint - That is a Claim.

Claims require EVIDENCE, of which you presented none when making your Claim.

[Katman]

So Katman - what else could it be?

Could they perhaps have been put there to support a story?

[Brian d marge]

BTW - Thanks for the positive Rep, It makes a change from your usual Tactic....

Okay.

What else could they be?

Could they be caused by an Industrial or Construction process? No, otherwise we would see marks like these on other concrete structures
Could they be caused by decay or the ravages of Time? No, otherwise we would see marks like these on other Concrete structures that are left over from World War 2
Could they be caused by Day-to-day usage of the structure? No, assuming that the structure isn't a Gas Chamber and has an innocent purpose - we would expect to see similar marks in similar structures as a result of day-to-day usage - we don't
Could they be caused by Animals? No, Animals don't care unless there is something to gain (food, Shelter etc.) or they are marking territory - yet the only animals of a big enough size to scratch in concrete don't live in Germany any more and if it were marking territory, we would expect to see them at a consistent height

The theory that they are made by the dieing, desperate people trying to escape their fate, when backed up with the other evidence (you know, all that Evidence that you haven't refuted yet) makes it the most plausible explanation.

However, if you have a competing theory - let me know your theory and submit your supporting evidence.

So Katman - what else could it be?

We do have peer review evidence for this do we not?

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

[TheDemonLord]

Could they perhaps have been put there to support a story?

So - Your evidence for denying the Holocaust is the Jewish Conspiracy Theory.
One of the Key points of your Jewish Conspiracy theory is downplaying the Holocaust.

Can you say Circular reasoning?