Comments like that simply prove how dumb you are, sorry.Originally Posted by Katman
Forum whore
Comments like that simply prove how dumb you are, sorry.
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
111000101000100010011110
Unless the demo experts were backed by psych experts who knew that is how the public would think, so they went ahead regardless...
edit: Also, spiderman was shit, they should have just scrapped it and started again with Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson or Vin 'I can't spell his last name' Deisile as lead.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
111000101000100010011110
You really can't maintain a discussion without resorting to insults can you? Not very christianly of you Ed.
Also, you don't seem to realise what my argument actually is, perhaps you need to go back through not only this thread, but the boston one to to find the post I remember making but expect you to do more work than I would need to to find it or just simply re-iterate it
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Ta
How would I know? You are the one who seems to think posting endless links to other sites, is the best way to make your point.
I followed one, and watched a video of building seven coming down. In that clip we appear to be looking at a parking entrance that goes under the building. IF explosives were being used they would have been detonated down there FIRST, working from the center outwards and upwards. No debris comes from in there till the floors above come down on it.
There is audio also, but oddly what is prevalent from that, are people saying things like "They're gonna bring it down". Even as it falls, queerly quietly compared to the voices. Which are meant to be voiced at a distance of about 100 meters as far as I could tell. Ya know, where the blasts would be very audible.
You reckon they used that quiet shatter glass in building seven? Don't hear any of that in the clip, but can hear people talking quite well.
These are observations I made, after watching a video that is supposed to be "irrefutable proof".
If you are right in how you see the whole event, you can never win the argument. Simply put, more people have made up more bullshit to try and convince everyone of a conspiracy, than the conspirators did to start with.
Forum whore
Really Ed?
NIST are the only ones who have put forward the theory that the building collapsed due to the failure of a single column.
They claimed to have proven this with a model yet refuse to release that model for public examination.
Why would that be?
Forum whore
You keep referring to this video Drew but I don't know which one you're talking about.
Help me out here.
Forum whore
Like I pointed out a long time ago, if you can't get off your lazy backside and go and look at the links I have posted, there is nothing more I can do or say.You really can't maintain a discussion without resorting to insults can you? Not very christianly of you Ed.
Also, you don't seem to realise what my argument actually is, perhaps you need to go back through not only this thread, but the boston one to to find the post I remember making but expect you to do more work than I would need to to find it or just simply re-iterate it
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
Ta
Sorry mate, it was fuckin pages ago. On a site that seemed to be an endless list of links. I clicked it at random, and stopped watching after about a minute once I had discounted it as rubbish.
I didn't know there would be a test later on.
Forum whore
Lets solve this once and for all. Do you believe that explosives were used in any of the buildings? A simple "yes" or "no" will suffice.
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
Ta
You are not helping anyone with the name calling, and personal attacks Ed.
Just saying.
111000101000100010011110
Why do you think I disagree with them? what point is it you think I'm trying to make? If you don't stay on your lazy backside (lets face it, getting out of one's chair just makes internet browsing less convenient) and check back through to what my point is, then you just look like a hypocrite with anger problems.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Forum whore
I guess I should quit this thread really, I get a bit short with people who cannot look at facts and objectively analyse links and who keep harping on about the very stuff that has already been discredited.
I could of course sink to their level and red rep them with the same vitriol and language they red rep me with...
The plain facts are that there were no explosives used in any of the buildings, so what kind of mentality does it take to keep on as these ones do?
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
Forum whore
You wanted me to repost the same links in another thread so you didn't have to go to the thread I told you they were on. I clearly directed everyone to the links but that wasn't good enough for you. Now you tell me who is being petty here?
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
111000101000100010011110
So why won't you do exactly the same as you are asking me to do, to correct yourself as to the point I am trying to make?
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Forum whore
Yes, I'm going with the theory that explosives were used in Building 7.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks