ANZACs and war and stuff

[Katman]

''Information'' is stretching it a bit don't you think?
The Woman's Weekly (so I am lead to believe) also has a lot information, but only if you choose to believe what you are reading.

I'm aware of your belief in your MENSA status Mark but are you really telling me you're smarter than all the Engineers, Scientists, Architects, Politicians, Doctors, Lawyers etc who also question the official 911 story?

[Crasherfromwayback]

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-se...leblowers.html

Sorry Steve...that's simply a whole lot of drivel about nothing. Although I'll admit to only reading 2/3 of it. It was putting me to sleep.

[Drew]

Sorry Steve...that's simply a whole lot of drivel about nothing. Although I'll admit to only reading 2/3 of it. It was putting me to sleep.

And ^this^ mofo is so bored he'll read anything right now!

[Katman]

Sorry Steve...that's simply a whole lot of drivel about nothing. Although I'll admit to only reading 2/3 of it. It was putting me to sleep.

No worries Pete.

Unfortunately it's about 2/3rds of the way through it that it gets to the point about 'Who would a whistleblower talk to about it?'

I would suggest that fear is a very effective silencer.

[Maha]

I'm aware of your belief in your MENSA status Mark but are you really telling me you're smarter than all the Engineers, Scientists, Architects, Politicians, Doctors, Lawyers etc who also question the official 911 story?

Engineers, Scientists, Architects, Politicians, Doctors and yes even Lawyers, have their views and opinions, right or wrong.
No I am not telling you I am smarter than any other those professions, I have my own profession and I will add that, neither of those listed, could as a good as job as I a can at it...so the flip side is, they are no smarter than I.
They are just in a different field of employment.

[Edbear]

Engineers, Scientists, Architects, Politicians, Doctors and yes even Lawyers, have their views and opinions, right or wrong.
No I am not telling you I am smarter than any other those professions, I have my own profession and I will add that, neither of those listed, could as a good as job as I a can at it...so the flip side is, they are no smarter than I.
They just in a different field of employment.

As I pointed out, do you believe the qualified experts who claimed a specific type of missile hit the Pentagon or the qualified experts who claimed a 757 did, with photographic evidence confirming it? When so many of the conspiracy theorists experts have been found wanting, would you not be more wary of believing those who support the conspiracy line and more inclined to believe those who have been proven correct?

[Katman]

Engineers, Scientists, Architects, Politicians, Doctors and yes even Lawyers, have their views and opinions, right or wrong.
No I am not telling you I am smarter than any other those professions, I have my own profession and I will add that, neither of those listed, could as a good as job as I a can at it...so the flip side is, they are no smarter than I.
They are just in a different field of employment.

So why would you feel the need to try to appear superior to anyone who holds a different view of 911 to yours?

Does carpet laying give you insights that no-one else is privileged to?

[Edbear]

So why would you feel the need to try to appear superior to anyone who holds a different view of 911 to yours?

Does carpet laying give you insights that no-one else is privileged to?

No one has to try to appear superior, the facts speak for themselves.

[Katman]

When so many of the conspiracy theorists experts have been found wanting, would you not be more wary of believing those who support the conspiracy line and more inclined to believe those who have been proven correct?

They are only proven correct in your own mind Ed because you want to believe they are correct.

[Ocean1]

And besides, I'm somewhat skeptical about those who claim to "know all about brains and how they work".

So, when an expert opinion fits your argument it’s all kosher, but if a complete professional discipline suggests that you don’t actually know what you’re talking about that’s bullshit.

Which is sorta proving their point. Innit?

[Katman]

So, when an expert opinion fits your argument it’s all kosher, but if a complete professional discipline suggests that you don’t actually know what you’re talking about that’s bullshit.

Which is sorta proving their point. Innit?

Not really.

I said I was somewhat skeptical - not that I thought it was bullshit.

Is I said earlier, it's not about wanting to believe an alternative theory (in fact it would be a whole lot more comfortable to blindly accept that no government could do something like this to their own people) but if things don't add up then you can hardly criticise those who want to question those irregularities.

[Edbear]

They are only proven correct in your own mind Ed because you want to believe they are correct.

As I pointed out, do you believe the qualified experts who claimed a specific type of missile hit the Pentagon or the qualified experts who claimed a 757 did, with photographic evidence confirming it? When so many of the conspiracy theorists experts have been found wanting, would you not be more wary of believing those who support the conspiracy line and more inclined to believe those who have been proven correct?

So typical of you, what part of this didn't you get?

When so many of the conspiracy theorists experts have been found wanting

do you believe [B]the qualified experts who claimed a specific type of missile hit the Pentagon or the qualified experts who claimed a 757 did, with photographic evidence confirming it?[/

[Katman]

When so many of the conspiracy theorists experts have been found wanting

I don't think David Ray Griffin or Richard Gage have been found wanting Ed.

You may well claim that they have been found wanting but once again, that's only in your own mind because you want to find them wanting.

[Drew]

that's only in your own mind because you want to find them wanting.

Foul! Statement has already been made by opponent, one point deduction.

[Maha]

So why would you feel the need to try to appear superior to anyone who holds a different view of 911 to yours?

Does carpet laying give you insights that no-one else is privileged to?

Two things....
Did you not take in what I said.. ''No I am not telling you I am smarter than any other those professions/they are no smarter than I''. no mention of trying to appear superior... equal, but on a different level.
...and I am not a carpet layer so I can't speak for them.