ANZACs and war and stuff

[Edbear]

I don't think David Ray Griffin or Richard Gage have been found wanting Ed.

You may well claim that they have been found wanting but once again, that's only in your own mind because you want to find them wanting.

You're nothing if not consistent in being silly.

do you believe [B]the qualified experts who claimed a specific type of missile hit the Pentagon or the qualified experts who claimed a 757 did, with photographic evidence confirming it?[/

None of your posturings alter the facts. The planes that hit the buildings were what have been proven to be. That no explosives were used in any of the buildings. You can now argue all you like.

[Katman]

Two things....
Did you not take in what I said.. ''No I am not telling you I am smarter than any other those professions/they are no smarter than I''. no mention of trying to appear superior... equal, but on a different level.
...and I am not a carpet layer so I can't speak for them.

So why the Woman's Weekly comment if it wasn't to try looking down your nose at someone else's opinion?

[Drew]

So why the Woman's Weekly comment if it wasn't to try looking down your nose at someone else's opinion?

He's weakening lads, this reads defensive to me!


ATTACK!

[Katman]

You're nothing if not consistent in being silly.

do you believe [B]the qualified experts who claimed a specific type of missile hit the Pentagon or the qualified experts who claimed a 757 did, with photographic evidence confirming it?[/

None of your posturings alter the facts. The planes that hit the buildings were what have been proven to be. That no explosives were used in any of the buildings. You can now argue all you like.

Like I've already said Ed, I haven't seen a photo of a plane hitting the Pentagon.

I have simply seen three or four photos of a few individual plane pieces.

I haven't seen any proof that they might not have been placed there after the explosion.

You're just believing they came from a plane hitting the Pentagon because you've been told that.

[Maha]

So why the Woman's Weekly comment if it wasn't to try looking down your nose at someone else's opinion?

It was a comparison. A comparison that should have alerted you to the fact that your link and the Woman's Weekly are full of fictional matter and open to interpretation by the reader of.
Going around in circles here Steve, try not to skim read, maybe that rose tint will fade.

[Drew]

You're just believing they came from a plane hitting the Pentagon because you've been told that.

I'm going to award a point for this, leveling things back up to nil all, (I only just started scoring, and there's no way in fuck I'm going back through this cunting thread)!

[Drew]

maybe that rose tint will fade.

Penalty!

Clearly Steve is looking through shit tinted glasses. Sin bin for being silly for you Mr!

[Katman]

It was a comparison. A comparison that should have alerted you to the fact that your link and the Woman's Weekly are full of fictional matter and open to interpretation by the reader of.
Going around in circles here Steve, try not to skim read, maybe that rose tint will fade.

It's only fictional matter in your own mind Mark because you want to believe it's fictional.

And besides Mark, you may just want to reassess your understanding of the word 'fictional'.

From what Lynne tells me, while the majority of the Woman's Weekly might well be described as mindless pap, very little of it is actual fiction.

[Banditbandit]

I'm going to award a point for this, leveling things back up to nil all, (I only just started scoring, and there's no way in fuck I'm going back through this cunting thread)!

(plus 10)

[Kickaha]

You're just believing they came from a plane hitting the Pentagon because you've been told that.

I believe it because of all these people plus some other stuff
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon...sses/bart.html
Of course they could all be Goverment stooges

[Laava]

From what Lynne tells me, while the majority of the Woman's Weekly might well be described as mindless pap, very little of it is actual fiction.

You know it's bad when it struggles to even be fiction.

[Katman]

I believe it because of all these people plus some other stuff
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon...sses/bart.html
Of course they could all be Goverment stooges

Well that was quite a read.

Yes, a number of people reported seeing a 757 hit the Pentagon. A number of people reported seeing at sorts of thing. Someone described the plane as a turbo prop another person said it was a commuter jet carrying about 8 - 12 people, others reported seeing no wreckage, others reported smelling cordite.

And what a pity they tailed the plane with a C130 instead of a fighter jet.

And isn't it odd that the C130 would have been allowed to take off when across the whole country every plane was being landed?

[Crasherfromwayback]

I've been here before.

[Katman]

This is an interesting snippet too.....

Bob Kerrey, the former Nebraska senator who also served as the ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, is appointed to the 9/11 Commission, replacing Max Cleland, who leaves the commission to accept a position on the board of the Export-Import Bank. [Washington Post, 12/10/2003] Just before resigning, Cleland called the Bush administration’s attempts to stonewall and “slow walk” the commission a “national scandal.” He criticized the commission for cutting a deal with the White House that compromised their access to information, and said, “I’m not going to be part of looking at information only partially. I’m not going to be part of just coming to quick conclusions. I’m not going to be part of political pressure to do this or not do that. I’m not going to be part of that. This is serious.”

It's quotes like that that suggest that even the 9/11 Commission was anything but impartial.

[Katman]

And no-one's even brought up yet how bizarre it is that the passport of one of the hijackers that was in the plane that hit the North Tower was found on the street and handed in to police even before the towers collapsed.