It's a shame the battleships have been relegated to history. There's nothing quite like 7.2tons of high explosive travelling at 700+m/s to scare the living shit out of everything within a 2k radius. Unfortunately a main armament range of 38k's isn't enough when you can put an aircraft or cruise missile on a 2m square target 500k away. Even for shore bombardment it's cheaper to put half a dozen ships firing 20 rounds a minute on the job rather than a single behemoth. Battleships are also a prick to defend as they attract all the attention and don't have the necessary maneuverability.
As for Cruisers, the yanks and Russians are the only ones to field them these days and they're literally very big destroyers rather than the traditional Cruiser.
Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
I do remember reading that the grunts in Nam loved battleship fire, it was big heavy and accurate.
Just another leather clad Tinkerbell.
The Wanker on the Fucking Harley is going for a ride!
...in 80 or 81 whilst I was bobbing around in the North Sea a fair way out from Norway the Russian Fleet, (a Russian Fleet), took a whole night and part of the next day to sail south past us. Even though they were on the horizon, you could still make out the guns on some and in line astern the whole show made a fairly exciting backdrop to what was a usually mundane horizon...
Incase anyones interested there is a armour plate at the Auckland Naval Museum from HMS New Zealand where she took a hit from a 16 inch german round. Pretty impressive that metal that thick can bend that much, makes you aware of the extreme forces at work.
Love naval gun fire support. Boom! 5 seconds later 100m high dust cloud.
You’ll notice in that pic of the Iowa firing a broadside that the main guns don’t all fire at the same time. The guns are sequenced to fire a fraction of a second apart because if they all fire at the same instant the shock would damage the ship. Even so a broadside still pushes the ship sideways about 6 feet. The Yamato had no boats or aircraft stored above deck - they were all stored in hanger space below decks because the blast from its 18.1” main guns would have destroyed them. Even the Iowa above has its boats on the port side, behind the stern turret, presumably for the same reason. So, no, you wouldn't want to be too close.
The views expressed above may not match yours - But that's the reason my Dad went to war - wasn't it?
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, .... but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out,... shouting "man, what a ride"!!!
Fuck! It can't be very good for your ears then!
Only a Rat can win a Rat Race!
Sob...and these megaliths will never be seen to fire again. Seems a right shame to me even though I realise that air craft carriers command the sea these days.
Hell, imagine sighting the Bismark or the Sharnhorst or the Giesnau off your port quarter. Bugger.
I thought the same, and a naval friend said up to 28feet of sideways movement.
We are all apparently wrong.
http://www.navweaps.com/index_tech/tech-022.htm
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks