Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 150

Thread: The Constitution. And shit.

  1. #46
    Join Date
    19th August 2003 - 15:32
    Bike
    RD350 KTM790R, 2 x BMW R80G/S, XT500
    Location
    Over there somewhere...
    Posts
    3,954
    Quote Originally Posted by Banditbandit View Post
    Our laws have existed here for 2,000 years ... and we are still here ... and we still follow them (and sometimes we follow your laws too.)
    2,000 years?

    Really?

  2. #47
    Join Date
    17th June 2010 - 16:44
    Bike
    bandit
    Location
    Bay of Plenty
    Posts
    2,885
    Quote Originally Posted by Akzle View Post
    haha. Treaty. So you need the queen to aknowledge your 'right' (as a 'native') to sovereignty...?

    And who you calling a white fallow?

    Some fuckn evidence. You havnt done a very good job of defending the cuntry from crackerism.
    No .. the Declaration of Independence is the basis for our internationally recognised sovereignty - the treaty references that declaration ...

    Jeez ... we don't need to - enough of our own peopl eare like that - even if their ethnicity is not ...
    "So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."

  3. #48
    Join Date
    17th June 2010 - 16:44
    Bike
    bandit
    Location
    Bay of Plenty
    Posts
    2,885
    Quote Originally Posted by Winston001 View Post
    Assuming "we" means Maori can't you see a problem here? In signing the Treaty, Maori accepted the Sovereignty of Queen Victoria and all of the laws which flowed from her (under a constitutional monarchy).
    No sorry .. Our ancestors signed the version in te reo Maori - which places tino rangatiratanga (sovereignty) with Maori ... Under New Zealand (and British law) an agreement , like a treaty or contractual agreement, has to be understood by both parties - or it is not enforcable. The white fellows who signed it understood both the Maori version and the English version (they wrote both) Maori understood the reo Maori version - but not the English version .. therefore the actual treaty is the Maori version - (see Appeal Court Decisdion of 1986) - and we have sovereigty and your Government has no legal basis ..

    In current times the Treaty is being upheld and reparations made - all flowing from laws enacted under the Crown. If Maori indigenous law still existed in any legal sense, there would be no Treaty Tribunal and no settlements.
    Yes, no and maybe ... We have put aside the queastion of the legality of the New Zealand Government under International Law ... maybe now is the tiem to raise it again ... and not al Maori buy into the settlement process ... Some people have claimed to represent al their iwi - others dispute that claim ..

    In a nutshell Maori cannot take the advantages of New Zealand laws and at the same time insist they have separate laws which entitle Maori to pick and choose which they follow. Its either one system or the other.
    Yes - it should have been ours ...

    But yes, I agree. The reality is one system for all ... Why has that been denied to us ???
    "So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."

  4. #49
    Join Date
    17th June 2010 - 16:44
    Bike
    bandit
    Location
    Bay of Plenty
    Posts
    2,885
    Quote Originally Posted by Oscar View Post
    2,000 years?

    Really?
    Yeah mate ... Moa bones cooked 2,000 years ago have been found in the hills of Hawke's Bay ... who do you think cooked them ???
    "So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."

  5. #50
    Join Date
    17th June 2010 - 16:44
    Bike
    bandit
    Location
    Bay of Plenty
    Posts
    2,885
    Quote Originally Posted by Akzle View Post
    ooh, ooh, i pick the other!

    Now, err, how do i get the police to enforce it?
    More importantly, how do i stop them from forcing crown law against me?
    YEAH !!!! Me too ... much more humane way to live as a society !!!
    "So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."

  6. #51
    Join Date
    17th June 2010 - 16:44
    Bike
    bandit
    Location
    Bay of Plenty
    Posts
    2,885
    Quote Originally Posted by avgas View Post
    Where you write it down?

    Sounds like Chinese whispers to me.....
    You're showing your cultural bias .. what privileges writing over oral sources ???

    Quote Originally Posted by unstuck View Post
    We shoulda just eaten all you native buggers from the getgo, like ya did to the Morioris.

    Funnily enough, some shearers dont have much of a sense of humour about that.
    Maybe because it's a myth that Māori ate the Moriori ...
    "So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."

  7. #52
    Join Date
    21st December 2010 - 10:40
    Bike
    Kate
    Location
    Kapiti Commute
    Posts
    2,832
    Quote Originally Posted by Banditbandit View Post
    Yeah mate ... Moa bones cooked 2,000 years ago have been found in the hills of Hawke's Bay ... who do you think cooked them ???
    The Chinese, that was one hell of a chicken fried rice.
    Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people. --- Unknown sage

  8. #53
    Join Date
    5th April 2004 - 20:04
    Bike
    Exxon Valdez
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    13,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Banditbandit View Post
    No sorry .. Our ancestors signed the version in te reo Maori - which places tino rangatiratanga (sovereignty) with Maori ... Under New Zealand (and British law) an agreement , like a treaty or contractual agreement, has to be understood by both parties - or it is not enforcable. The white fellows who signed it understood both the Maori version and the English version (they wrote both) Maori understood the reo Maori version - but not the English version .. therefore the actual treaty is the Maori version - (see Appeal Court Decisdion of 1986) - and we have sovereigty and your Government has no legal basis ..



    Yes, no and maybe ... We have put aside the queastion of the legality of the New Zealand Government under International Law ... maybe now is the tiem to raise it again ... and not al Maori buy into the settlement process ... Some people have claimed to represent al their iwi - others dispute that claim ..



    Yes - it should have been ours ...

    But yes, I agree. The reality is one system for all ... Why has that been denied to us ???
    You realise I hope, that making sense and being informed, is grounds to be burnt at the stake around here aye!

  9. #54
    Join Date
    19th August 2003 - 15:32
    Bike
    RD350 KTM790R, 2 x BMW R80G/S, XT500
    Location
    Over there somewhere...
    Posts
    3,954
    Quote Originally Posted by Banditbandit View Post
    Yeah mate ... Moa bones cooked 2,000 years ago have been found in the hills of Hawke's Bay ... who do you think cooked them ???
    The Irish?

    The generally accepted date for Maori settlement is 1200-1300.
    Moa's hit by lightning don't count...

  10. #55
    Join Date
    5th April 2004 - 20:04
    Bike
    Exxon Valdez
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    13,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Banditbandit View Post
    Yeah mate ... Moa bones cooked 2,000 years ago have been found in the hills of Hawke's Bay ... who do you think cooked them ???
    Quote Originally Posted by Oscar View Post
    The Irish?

    The generally accepted date for Maori settlement is 1200-1300.
    Moa's hit by lightning don't count...
    This is quite interesting.

    I really shouldn't be so lazy when it comes to educating myself about things...Ah fuck it. The more I know, the more confused I'll become!

  11. #56
    Join Date
    19th August 2003 - 15:32
    Bike
    RD350 KTM790R, 2 x BMW R80G/S, XT500
    Location
    Over there somewhere...
    Posts
    3,954
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    This is quite interesting.

    I really shouldn't be so lazy when it comes to educating myself about things...Ah fuck it. The more I know, the more confused I'll become!
    From the Te Ara website:

    New Zealand has a shorter human history than any other country. The precise date of settlement is a matter of debate, but current understanding is that the first arrivals came from East Polynesia in the 13th century. It was not until 1642 that Europeans became aware the country existed.
    http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/history/page-1


    From Wikipedia:
    The history of New Zealand dates back at least 700 years to when it was discovered and settled by Polynesians, who developed a distinct Māori culture centred on kinship links and land.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_New_Zealand

    Herindoors works in a Museum, so I get to see quite a bit of this info...

  12. #57
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by Oscar View Post

    Herindoors works in a Museum, so I get to see quite a bit of this info...
    ....as an exhibit.

  13. #58
    Join Date
    17th June 2010 - 16:44
    Bike
    bandit
    Location
    Bay of Plenty
    Posts
    2,885
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    You realise I hope, that making sense and being informed, is grounds to be burnt at the stake around here aye!
    Absolutely !!! That's what's fun about it ...
    "So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."

  14. #59
    Join Date
    17th June 2010 - 16:44
    Bike
    bandit
    Location
    Bay of Plenty
    Posts
    2,885
    Quote Originally Posted by Oscar View Post
    The Irish?

    The generally accepted date for Maori settlement is 1200-1300.
    Moa's hit by lightning don't count...
    "Generally accepted" is not proof .. it was once generally accepted that the earth was flat .. and that human beings could not travel at speeds greateer that 30mph .. because they would never get enough oxygen adn would die ... and so on ...

    The bones werre found in caves with evidence of cooking fires ... and cooking marks on the bones.
    "So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."

  15. #60
    Join Date
    14th August 2011 - 14:32
    Bike
    Triumph Saint,Triumph Adventurer
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    641
    Quote Originally Posted by Oscar View Post
    The Irish?

    The generally accepted date for Maori settlement is 1200-1300.
    Moa's hit by lightning don't count...
    Hit by lightning

    Anyway,there were several small groups of people around NZ before the arrival of Maori.
    In Northland there is legend of them and bones ect have been found in other areas.

    Where history goes further back with some Maori is that they are desended from the old people due to the assimilation that went on.

    My great grandfather was a full blooded Ngapuhi paramount chief around Whangarei and he was said to be desended from the old people.

    He would of seen his history as being longer than 1000 years.

    Just saying.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •