David Bain vs The Crown - game over

[Katman]

The fact is, Robin could not have done it, end of.

Well if that really was fact Ed then how could the jury have had reasonable doubt that David did it?

No-one else was ever suggested as the killer.

It's basic logic Ed. If the jury had reasonable doubt that David was the killer then they must have considered that there was a possibility that Robin was the killer.

[Edbear]

Well the second jury clearly thought otherwise Ed.

Well if that really was fact Ed then how could the jury have had reasonable doubt that David did it?

No-one else was ever suggested as the killer.

It's basic logic Ed. If the jury had reasonable doubt that David was the killer then they must have considered that there was a possibility that Robin was the killer.

Once again your lack of comprehension shows. Even the jurors emphased they did not consider either Robin as a suspect or that David was innocent. They clearly stated that it was simply that the Prosecution had not presented their case such that it met the standard of beyond reasonable doubt.

[Katman]

Once again your lack of comprehension shows. Even the jurors emphased they did not consider either Robin as a suspect or that David was innocent. They clearly stated that it was simply that the Prosecution had not presented their case such that it met the standard of beyond reasonable doubt.

You're not very good at logic, are you Ed?

[scissorhands]

Bain, Pora and Watson all look a bit autistic to me....

It high time peeps with birth defects and mental disorders get correct services at a young age.

Poor souls get spawned and raised by unhealthy parents, then undiagnosed and unseen disorders have them struggle with school and peers. Then due to everyone hating them and the cops wanting to 'keep the peace' the cops put the boot in. Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet

How much time and money gets sucked up by good sorts all over NZ, trying to right these wrongs??

A stitch in time
Diagnose them early
Retrain the dogs

[Edbear]

You're not very good at logic, are you Ed?

Pfft! You are appalling at accepting fact over conjecture. You never have let facts influence your pet theories. You are an expert at ignoring factual evidence in favour of your "logic".

Once again you have shown yourself to be unworthy of being taken at all seriously.

[Banditbandit]

It high time peeps with birth defects and mental disorders get correct services at a young age.

People get put in jail for underage sex in this country !!!

[Katman]

Once again you have shown yourself to be unworthy of being taken at all seriously.

Hey, I'm not the one struggling to understand basic logic.

[Crasherfromwayback]

. The fact is, Robin could not have done it, end of.

That's not a fact at all.

[Katman]

"Police have released forensic evidence to defence lawyers in the Teina Pora case - 16 months after a court order told them to".

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=10893134

Why the hold-up?

[scissorhands]

People get put in jail for underage sex in this country !!!

Lock all the kids up till they reach 16!!!

[Edbear]

That's not a fact at all.

So explain how he could have done it without getting anyone else's blood on him or his clothing, without any gunshot residue, and without any injuries from fighting with his son.

[Katman]

So explain how he could have done it without getting anyone else's blood on him or his clothing, without any gunshot residue, and without any injuries from fighting with his son.

See, you're just assuming that the marks on his thumb weren't residue from the magazine.

I don't think that's been categorically ruled out yet.

And, he had injuries to his hands. The coroner photographed them.

[Crasherfromwayback]

So explain how he could have done it without getting anyone else's blood on him or his clothing, without any gunshot residue, and without any injuries from fighting with his son.

Simply because I can't give you a good reason for any of that shit does not make it a *fact* that he didn't do it.

[Edbear]

See, you're just assuming that the marks on his thumb weren't residue from the magazine.

I don't think that's been categorically ruled out yet.

And, he had injuries to his hands. The coroner photographed them.

Good thing you are not a forensic pathologist then. Does not alter my statement above.

Simply because I can't give you a good reason for any of that shit does not make it a *fact* that he didn't do it.

Yes it does. Ask any forensic pathologist.

[Katman]

Do you agree Ed, that there was some doubt in the jury's mind that David was the killer?