Easy obviously. Same way you can say it's a *fact* that Robin Bain didn't do it. Just lie.Originally Posted by Edbear
Fully qualified Sifter.
Easy obviously. Same way you can say it's a *fact* that Robin Bain didn't do it. Just lie.
Anarchic Wild Child
Robin Bain may have killed Scott Guy !!!!
http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/new-evi...-of-scott-guy/
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
Hardcore Biker
There is no guarantee the person who wrote the message used the mouse at all, a mouse is in most cases unnecessary with a computer, they mostly exist for convenience. Especially back in 94 when computers were more basic than they are now.
Anarchic Wild Child
Fuck .. if judges did that we would have no defence lawyers in this country ...
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
Que?
Congratulations, you're the third to post that in this thread (at least).
Loud and Uncouth
Like slagging off a dead victim (Sophie Elliot) to boost their clients image (Clayton the Egotistical Killer)
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Anarchic Wild Child
Oh .. sorry .. I haven't been completely following this thread .. I gave up on it many days ago .. just drop in now and then for a laff ...
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
Que?
No need to apologise at all. I didn't follow if between pages (approximately) 10 and 25 as it was all a bit boring. I've been participating more recently as the practice of winding up drongos has proved to be highly entertaining, thanks Scummy & Drew.
Forum whore
I understand that, but where is the justice if such minute can be used successfully to get an offender off such a serious charge? If someone is proven guilty, then the defense should be to argue mitigating circumstances in an effort to reduce the punishment or something. This offender got away scott free with an act that could have, and often does, kill and maim innocent people.
Pfft! The incontrovertible evidence proves Robin could not be the killer. That dictionary defined evidence as proof of fact. If Robin didn't do it is a fact. Get off your high horse for a minute. Accusing me of lying is stupid.
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
Hardcore Biker
There us no incontrovertible evidence that Robin is innocent, if there were David would still be in prison, the privy council would have never even recommended a retrial if that were the case.
Forum whore
Not even the judges or juries who heard all of the evidence ever considered Robin a likely suspect. And as has been brought out, the jurors who found the not guilty verdict, did not consider David innocent.
David would not still be in prison, having served his sentnce. All this is in retrospect.
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
Fully qualified Sifter.
You struggled with the word *fact*. Lets see how you go with the word *hypocrisy*.
Forum whore
Whatever, Pete...
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
Que?
For someone who regularly professes to know an awful lot about an awful lot you're sure making yourself look like even more of an idiot than you normally do Ed. To be proven guilty of a crime the prosecution must demonstrate if required that due process has been followed. It had not in the case being discussed, which means all the evidence in the world amounted to jack shit.
Sharpen up.
Forum whore
Yeah, whatever...
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks