Not really.
Appeals are not and can never be retrials. Instead they are an examination of the case to see if there are any obvious flaws. For example, a jury which decided guilty for a drug grower because he didn't understand the difference between seed tomatoes and grafted tomatoes. The dope plants grew like grafted toms but there was no evidence about the differences. The jury just knew about it, applied common sense, and convicted.
No good. Retrial.
Most appeals are on points of law - judge gave wrong instructions to the jury or misinterpreted the law. On rare occassions it can be argued that the weight of evidence was against conviction and the jury got it wrong. Damned hard to prove.
Whatever. Usually if an appeal is successful there is a new trial, so the accused does not get to walk.
http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/joe-kar...-in-bain-home/
BREAKING NEWS
Originally Posted by The Civilian
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
One of The Civilian's weaker attempts.
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
I think the one thing we can all agree on is that Bain sympathisers keep our media friends in business, and happy.
Apparently that will be the cops fault. Still I bet that if the sick fuck met an untimely, nasty, violent end, and you had no good alibi, and they decided to put you in the frame, the fact that you had gone to the cops earlier and had received no satisfaction would be front and centre in the case against you.
That's how this shit really works.
Keep on chooglin'
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks