David Bain vs The Crown - game over

[oneofsix]

19 'shells'.
How many were fired?

How many times did he have to shoot each person?

Even with jams the one 10-shot mag have done the trick.

How do you get 19 shells in one 10 shot mag? That is a good trick, were you on the investigation team? BTW it was your colleges that counted the shells, are you too now questioning them - oh hold on that would mean you weren't on the team.

[scumdog]

How do you get 19 shells in one 10 shot mag? That is a good trick, were you on the investigation team? BTW it was your colleges that counted the shells, are you too now questioning them - oh hold on that would mean you weren't on the team.

Did somebody say you could fit 19 shells in the one 10 shot mag?

I must have missed that post...


And why worry who counted the shells?

And why can't you tell me how many shots ended up in each victim??

[MisterD]

"at the time" = 13 years of trying to prove his innocence. indeed, entrenched views.

"at the time" = just shot his Dad, still covered in his brothers blood and forgot the details of his scene staging.

Yeah, I have a very entrenched view that nobody kills their family, then gets cleaned up to commit suicide. Nobody kills their family and then themselves making it appear that the one surviving member did the deed, then makes the effort to leave a note to that person on a computer apparently exonerating them...when a quick handwritten note would be incontrovertible.

I just can't contort my mind through the hoops required to believe David isn't guilty beyond reasonable doubt, never mind balance of probability.

[imdying]

All the while David is having a quiet chuckle to himself over how long it took for somebody to notice one of the finer details he planted

[Edbear]

"at the time" = just shot his Dad, still covered in his brothers blood and forgot the details of his scene staging.

Yeah, I have a very entrenched view that nobody kills their family, then gets cleaned up to commit suicide. Nobody kills their family and then themselves making it appear that the one surviving member did the deed, then makes the effort to leave a note to that person on a computer apparently exonerating them...when a quick handwritten note would be incontrovertible.

I just can't contort my mind through the hoops required to believe David isn't guilty beyond reasonable doubt, never mind balance of probability.

What I find interesting is the typical KB way some members completely ignore relevant posts such as Meteor's post #41. I also note that many of those very same members support the conspiracy views on the other threads.

"If it's anti Police, anti Govt. then it must be right by default, never mind any evidence to the contrary."

What's the bet none of them will answer Meteor's post?

[Katman]

And why can't you tell me how many shots ended up in each victim??

If you'd watched the program last night you wouldn't have to ask.

[scumdog]

If you'd watched the program last night you wouldn't have to ask.

So you don't knew either??
Dang!

[Katman]

What I find interesting is the typical KB way some members completely ignore relevant posts such as Meteor's post #41. I also note that many of those very same members support the conspiracy views on the other threads.

On the contrary Ed.

I find it interesting that many in this thread seem to be very selective of what stories they're prepared to question.

[Katman]

So you don't knew either??
Dang!

Why don't you stop being such a lazy copper and watch the program?

There's a link to the On Demand video earlier in the thread.

[scumdog]

Why don't you stop being such a lazy copper and watch the program?

There's a link to the On Demand video earlier in the thread.

Nah, fishing on KB is more interesting...

[oneofsix]

"at the time" = just shot his Dad, still covered in his brothers blood and forgot the details of his scene staging.

Yeah, I have a very entrenched view that nobody kills their family, then gets cleaned up to commit suicide. Nobody kills their family and then themselves making it appear that the one surviving member did the deed, then makes the effort to leave a note to that person on a computer apparently exonerating them...when a quick handwritten note would be incontrovertible.

I just can't contort my mind through the hoops required to believe David isn't guilty beyond reasonable doubt, never mind balance of probability.

But he didn't forget to leave such a fine detail in the first place?
Been plenty of cases of people that tied up before suicide especially after killing loved ones.
Handwriting requires materials to hand and a computer covers the shakes.
Yes I can see how it is hard to untwist your closed mind through those contorted hoops you have forced it.

All the while David is having a quiet chuckle to himself over how long it took for somebody to notice one of the finer details he planted

If it was him he would have been crying that it as taken nearly 20 years, 13 of which he spent in prison, for someone reading an online blog to notice.

[Katman]

Nah, fishing on KB is more interesting...

Ah well, that's up to you.

It's not me making a joke of your profession.

[Katman]

Yes I can see how it is hard to untwist your closed mind through those contorted hoops you have forced it.

Oh, the irony.

[Akzle]

jews did it.

[Drew]

All the while David is having a quiet chuckle to himself over how long it took for somebody to notice one of the finer details he planted

13 years in the clink, bet he's not laughing that fucken hard.

What I find interesting is the typical KB way some members completely ignore relevant posts such as Meteor's post #41. I also note that many of those very same members support the conspiracy views on the other threads.

"If it's anti Police, anti Govt. then it must be right by default, never mind any evidence to the contrary."

What's the bet none of them will answer Meteor's post?

That's quite hypocritical there Ed. You choose not to try and see anyone else' point, as much as the next guy as far as I can see....(yeah yeah, I'm a hypocrite too).

It's not me making a joke of your profession.

His profession, or us?