Thinking of getting vaccinated?

**bogan** · 14th April 2017, 15:19

Originally Posted by Katman

You've watched 10 minutes worth of 3 and a half hours content.

How can you possibly discuss it?

Rationally. And starting with what I outlined in those 10 minutes, would you disagree with my statement that they outlined many ways in which studies could be perverted, but failed to show that any actually had been?

Originally Posted by Katman

Pregnant women are now being warned against eating certain fish due to the level of mercury in them and yet they are being actively encouraged to get the flu vaccine which contains a higher level of mercury.

Does that make any sense?

Yes. Mercury toxicity is cumulative, the body can easily process the mercury in a flu jab, obtained once a year, it cannot process the vastly higher amount of mercury ingested by a diet including contaminated fish.

**Katman** · 14th April 2017, 15:25

Originally Posted by bogan

Yes. Mercury toxicity is cumulative, the body can easily process the mercury in a flu jab, obtained once a year, it cannot process the vastly higher amount of mercury ingested by a diet including contaminated fish.

Ethyl mercury is considerably more toxic than methyl mercury.

**Katman** · 14th April 2017, 15:26

Originally Posted by bogan

Rationally. And starting with what I outlined in those 10 minutes, would you disagree with my statement that they outlined many ways in which studies could be perverted, but failed to show that any actually had been?

Watch some more of the videos and you might actually have something worth offering to a discussion.

**bogan** · 14th April 2017, 15:31

Originally Posted by Katman

Ethyl mercury is considerably more toxic than methyl mercury.

Good thing the dose is considerably less than fuck all then.

Originally Posted by Katman

Watch some more of the videos and you might actually have something worth offering to a discussion.

No, I have contributed a rational point about the irrationality of the videos, that is enough to begin a discussion if the other side is willing, evidently, you are not. As with Ty Bollinger, you claim to have the motivation/method is right, yet your actions show the polar opposite. If you have nothing rational to contribute, I'll leave you and husa to your gish gallop.

**Katman** · 14th April 2017, 15:32

Originally Posted by bogan

Yes. Mercury toxicity is cumulative, the body can easily process the mercury in a flu jab, obtained once a year,

What if the polysorbate 80 I mentioned earlier is providing a means for the mercury to cross the blood/brain barrier?

**Katman** · 14th April 2017, 15:34

Originally Posted by bogan

No, I have contributed a rational point about the irrationality of the videos, that is enough to begin a discussion if the other side is willing, evidently, you are not.

If you're not prepared to watch the videos you can hardly call yourself willing to partake in a rational discussion about them.

**Katman** · 14th April 2017, 16:14

And let's not forget that during the 50s and 60s, the medical profession was used by the tobacco industry to promote the benefits of smoking.

Today the medical profession is being used to promote the interests of the pharmaceutical industry.

I believe those interests are more aimed at making money rather than at improving the well-being of society.

**Katman** · 14th April 2017, 16:52

And talking of polio, has anyone seen the graph comparing DDT use to the incidence of polio?

It appears the polio vaccination program was required as a direct result of pesticide use.

**Zarkov** · 14th April 2017, 16:57

Haha

183 Pages.

**Ocean1** · 14th April 2017, 17:01

Originally Posted by Katman

You've watched 10 minutes worth of 3 and a half hours content.

How can you possibly discuss it?

Probably for the same reason most of us don't bother reading your posts, a couple of minutes reading is more than enough to establish them as unmitigated crap, there's no possible benefit in exposing yourself to more of the same.

**Katman** · 14th April 2017, 17:02

Originally Posted by Ocean1

Probably for the same reason most of us don't bother reading your posts, a couple of minutes reading is more than enough to establish them as unmitigated crap, there's no possible benefit in exposing yourself to more of the same.

But you keep coming back.

**Katman** · 14th April 2017, 17:10

Originally Posted by bogan

I gave Ep 2 10 minutes, it said the right things to start with (that which was on the tin also); unbiased examination of the science etc. It then proceeded to outline scenarios and methods which could pervert studies, yet failed to put forward any sort of examination of studies to show that had actually happened.

I'll give you a teaser......

Towards the end of Ep 2 is a perfect example of perverting results to push an agenda.

See if you can find it.

**Katman** · 14th April 2017, 17:14

http://www.sv40foundation.org/cpv-link.html

**husaberg** · 14th April 2017, 17:48

Originally Posted by Katman

And talking of polio, has anyone seen the graph comparing DDT use to the incidence of polio?

It appears the polio vaccination program was required as a direct result of pesticide use.

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/6.gif

You are full of shit.
You should rest well at night knowing you are doing your best spreading what is at best ill-informed paranoia, but mostly total fabrications , You continue to do so with the full knowledge it will kill innocent children.