Thinking of getting vaccinated?

[RDJ]

Thanks for confirming my point.

You're confirming your idiocy.

[RDJ]

Thanks for confirming my point.

Don't thank me you self-beclowner (yes I know you were being Katman-ironic) I see your ilk as partly responsible for serious damage to children (and their parents). Get a grip on reality or shut up.

[husaberg]

You are of course not alone - Jenny McCarthy and Andrew Wakefield are just two of your cretinous idols.

But your feelgoodness comes at the expense of people's - often childrens' - health and capability to lead a good life when appropriately protected against chance of preventable nasty illness.

There is a risk of vaccination, and there is a benefit from vaccination, and the risk-benefit calculation is hugely in favour of vaccination and that is supremely evident for all but lack-witted idiotic effwits like you.

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/...y-spins-im-not

[Katman]

People like you want to signal your virtue by being edgy and challenging what you think is dubious science.

What you actually do, is sway people who are doubtful, onto your side of the stupidity fence.

If that's the case, maybe it just suggests I have a rather more compelling argument than you.

[husaberg]

An average of about 700 children under 14 die from unintentional drowning every year - in America alone.

yet since the introduction of vaccinations hundreds of thousands of children in the the same country have or caught polio or died from it.
20000 cases less in the first year alone.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pi...rted-cases.pdf
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/polio/index.html

[RDJ]

Quoth Katman: If that's the case, maybe it just suggests I have a rather more compelling argument than you.

Srsly? That's what you conclude? Please reassure us that you are not active in any industry that involves safety, logic, and progress. (But you probably are).

[Woodman]

If that's the case, maybe it just suggests I have a rather more compelling argument than you.

Yet you have been proven wrong in this thread over and over.

[Katman]

Please reassure us that you are not active in any industry that involves safety, logic, and progress. (But you probably are).

You're a perfect example of how just deeply the medical profession has become indoctrinated by the pharmaceutical industry.

[husaberg]

You're a perfect example of how just deeply the medical profession has become indoctrinated by the pharmaceutical industry.

[Banditbandit]

If that's the case, maybe it just suggests I have a rather more compelling argument than you.

No, my friend, I am sorry. That's a "100 million blowflies can't be wrong" argument ...

[Katman]

No, my friend, I am sorry. That's a "100 million blowflies can't be wrong" argument ...

Within the context of RDJ's comment that I was replying to, why else do you think some people might be 'swayed'?

[Ocean1]

Within the context of RDJ's comment that I was replying to, why else do you think some people might be 'swayed'?

It's been growing problem ever since cheap vaccinations suspended the Darwin effect.

Up until then fuckwits didn't get the chance to be "swayed", they just dropped dead.

[F5 Dave]

211 pages of this thread - good grief. Had my flu shot week ago. Don't think there are any side effects.

However, oddly, I'm pretty sure that I can smell in colour since then.


[unsubscribe]
See you in another 100 pages.

[RDJ]

If that's the case, maybe it just suggests I have a rather more compelling argument than you.

FFS.

Y'see Katman this is the problem right here. You appear to think there is a compelling argument to be made against vaccination. You probably also think, given your approach to logic and evidence, there is a compelling argument to be made against gravity and only if you present a very compelling argument you could float like a vacuous stream of detached consciousness far above the ground the rest of us actually inhabit. (Oh, wait...).

Anyway, I don't look for a compelling argument in the debate against the existence of gravity, because were I to choose to avoid the physics of kinetic energy and deceleration in favour of a lusciously compelling argument that I can come to an immediate stop when hitting immovable objects at speed without any personal damage, I don't think that would work out well.

You persist in wanting to have an emotion-based debate about the effects of bacteria and viruses. They are basically like The Terminator. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And they will absolutely not stop, ever, until you are infected, unless you are dead and its host dies, or we manage to kill it. And there are many viral illnesses for which there are simply no cure. Like measles. So we are better off stopping it from ever infecting you.

If that's not compelling enough, well, not a problem. I'll go and collect my bi-weekly cheque from big Pharma for following my "indoctrination"*.

* I'm actually curious though, do you really believe that all the people who advise in favour of vaccination do so simply because of indoctrination? That's a really strange space-time continuum you live in.

[Katman]

Y'see Katman this is the problem right here. You appear to think there is a compelling argument to be made against vaccination.

And yet you choose to ignore every study that I've linked.