Thinking of getting vaccinated?

[Katman]

Dude, anyone with your capacity to believe six mutually impossible things before breakfast doesn't have the rational wherewithal to be evaluating the intellectual capacity of anyone.

So let me get this straight.....

You think that anyone who isn't vaccinated is a threat to your family and therefore you are entitled to kill them - yet you question my rationality?

What an absolute fuckwit.

[mashman]

My children aren't dying of hunger.

Anarchists don't have "systems"

I'm not in any position to "let" someone else's child die of hunger, that would be the parents.

And your "suspicions" are worth about as much as your drivel about most things, dude: sweet fuck all.

Why do you care? A rational anarchist wouldn't give a shit about his kids.

You're not an anarchist. You're a fascist.

Of course you are. You choose not to, and that is entirely up to you.

Oh, I thought the article evidenced my suspicion quite well. Rational anarchist indeed. I doubt they'd have you.

[Ocean1]

Why do you care? A rational anarchist wouldn't give a shit about his kids.

You're not an anarchist. You're a fascist.

Of course you are. You choose not to, and that is entirely up to you.

Oh, I thought the article evidenced my suspicion quite well. Rational anarchist indeed. I doubt they'd have you.

You appear to believe that repeating yourself produces some sort of truth.

Which makes you wrong on all fronts.

Again.

[Ocean1]

So let me get this straight.....

You think that anyone who isn't vaccinated is a threat to your family and therefore you are entitled to kill them - yet you question my rationality?

Correct on both counts.

Finally.

[mashman]

You appear to believe that repeating yourself produces some sort of truth.

Which makes you wrong on all fronts.

Again.

You're the one who quoted yourself as a rational anarchist and then threatened to kill any unvaccinated person coz they threaten the security of someone you're pretending to care for. You stated it yourself. So actually, I'm repeating you. Deny it as much as you like, but you Son, are a fascist of epic proportions.

[Ocean1]

You're the one who quoted yourself as a rational anarchist and then threatened to kill any unvaccinated person coz they threaten the security of someone you're pretending to care for. You stated it yourself. So actually, I'm repeating you. Deny it as much as you like, but you Son, are a fascist of epic proportions.

Which is both perfectly rational and completely in keeping with the principle of personal responsibility.

Not that I expect a whining incompetent that wants everyone else to buy his lunch to spot the difference.

[Katman]

Deny it as much as you like, but you Son, are a fascist of epic proportions.

You spelt fuckwit wrong.

[mashman]

You spelt fuckwit wrong.

ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaa...

Which is both perfectly rational and completely in keeping with the principle of personal responsibility.

Not that I expect a whining incompetent that wants everyone else to buy his lunch to spot the difference.

Yeah, but you're doing that at the expense of someone else's personal responsibility. Firstly, your kids. Secondly, you're removing the choice to self-determination of what they consider personal responsibility, because you don't like it. A fascist by any other name etc...

Who's that then?

[Ocean1]

ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaa...



Yeah, but you're doing that at the expense of someone else's personal responsibility. Firstly, your kids. Secondly, you're removing the choice to self-determination of what they consider personal responsibility, because you don't like it. A fascist by any other name etc...

Who's that then?

Said the whining incompetent that wants everyone else to buy his lunch.

And I'm personally responsible for someone else's personal responsibility now?

You're just arguing for the sake of it now, aincha? 'Cause you sure as fuck don't have an actual argument.

[Katman]

You're just arguing for the sake of it now, aincha? 'Cause you sure as fuck don't have an actual argument.

Do you remember posting this....

What I suggest is in fact the reality, completely unrecognised officially (and usually otherwise), is that people behave in such a manner that THEY believe represents a level of risk to both themselves and others that’s acceptable to THEM. This is nature’s default setting, and I can’t see anything in society’s attempts to the contrary that makes me believe there’s a better way.

[TheDemonLord]

Then you're not a Rational Anarchist. You're a fascist.

It would. Ironically I want you to be a clone of me.

Who is the Fascist again?

And for bonus Irony points - The Fascists started off as Socialists...

[mashman]

Said the whining incompetent that wants everyone else to buy his lunch.

And I'm personally responsible for someone else's personal responsibility now?

You're just arguing for the sake of it now, aincha? 'Cause you sure as fuck don't have an actual argument.

Where did I state that?

Well you claimed that you'd kill someone else because their personal responsibility would impact on the personal responsibility of someone that wasn't just yourself. So yeah, that's exactly what you did

No, I'm just calling you on your irrational bullshit... but love the way you retreat everytime you've been pegged.

[Ocean1]

Do you remember posting this....

Do you remember having had a point?

[Ocean1]

Where did I state that?

Well you claimed that you'd kill someone else because their personal responsibility would impact on the personal responsibility of someone that wasn't just yourself. So yeah, that's exactly what you did

No, I'm just calling you on your irrational bullshit... but love the way you retreat everytime you've been pegged.

You're a communists, you state that pretty much everywhere, any chance you get.

Of course. If you wave a machete around kids I am personally responsible for then I will remove the threat to them. The fact that you believe you have a right to wave that machete around and can't see a problem with it is irrelevant.

In spite of your constant whining to the contrary I'm not responsible for the consequences of your actions, the fact that you're confused about who that would be is also not my problem.

[Katman]

Do you remember having had a point?

So do you think "people should behave in such a manner that THEY believe represents a level of risk to themselves and others that's acceptable to THEM" or in a manner that's acceptable to you?

'Cos it sounds like you don't know what the fuck to think.