Fits into category of lifejacket...Originally Posted by Katman
Forum whore
Fits into category of lifejacket...
No8 Wire Extraordinaire
Anti vaxers should have the right go choose.
Either Vaxination or if they don't want that, Vasectomy. Cause we don't want stupid fucks like that to breed.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Forum whore
It also fits into the category of receiving medical treatment regardless of whether you've been vaccinated or not.
Wearing Hi-Viz Black.
I'd suggest not being elligible for public healthcare. If someone does not want to vaccinate then they don't receive a ventilator and can fight any disease on their own terms. Sadly they infect others along the way...
There's a good video from a doctor doing the rounds on "herd immunity". Rather good viewing from the scientific community and he isn't impressed with the fuckwits and their "beliefs".
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
"channellling the Pleideans"
I dont need to forcibly vaccinate people. What I will do is either forcibly sterilise people who dont get vaccinated - that takes care of the problem but in a while. If i decide I want a more...... final solution, I'll go a step further: with the vaccines I will add an antidote. Then I will aerosol spray the poison. The planes I use to spray the chemtrails should do it. That way the problem goes away and humanity is better off. Win win.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
Pootler
Can you make the chemtrails to be Lime flavor? That would be cool. And maybe different colours, white gets boring.
Forum whore
You remind me of one of the characters in Lord of the Flies.
Forum whore
Refer post #22.
"channellling the Pleideans"
Thanks. I,ve always thought I would be great at being an evil henchman. In charge of ideas group, perhaps the eugenics programme.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
Forum whore
I choose to disagree. Refusing a safety device is not the same as refusing to believe in science. If you went out on a boat without a lifejacket because you didnt believe human beings drown in water then no I wouldnt send the coastguard...
Refusing a vaccine is a choice to believe in science or not. Vaccines are a product of medical research and technology. If you dont trust that then thats perfectly OK as long as you dont then expect science to keep you alive when you get ill. As it turns out - this virus might just be a bit difficult to vaccinate for so its a mute point anyway...
On a happier note - I notice the gun rights extremists were wandering around in mobs protesting lockdown as a violation of their rights... I have friends in ER in the americas. In some cases they are so overwhealmed that they are simply making choices on who gets treated and who dies - I know I wouldnt bother with the protesters..
Forum whore
Your analogies are as bad as TDL's.
Aio ki te Aorangi
It's when science is no longer backed by observation that the problems occur. One person tells another, who tells another, who tells another... which starts to question the validity of the science. The vast majority are pushed away as accepted collateral damage. Those who get through get given money to look after themselves into the future, and the vaccine is added to a list of potentially contributing factors that are accepted as having contributed to whatever the resulting impaired condition may be.
There's a reason to lie. A big fat financial reason. If it isn't vaccinations. Then what is it? Salt? Sugar? Salt + Sugar + Vaccinations + all I need is the air that I breathe... Direct observation is showing that vaccination is in there.
As such, "anti-vaxx" does not mean anti-science. It simply shows that there's a distrust with the vaccination industry from those who are SEEING evidence that's contrary to the popular narrative that's been pushed for decades. I don't call that anti-science given that it holds up under the first pillar of scientific scrutiny i.e. it is an observed behaviour, it now needs to be described, objectively.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Forum whore
An interesting viewpoint.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/hea...al-and-immoral
Forum whore
Shes the deputy leader of the social credit party....
Forum whore
That's right. It even says so in the article - twice.
It's still an interesting viewpoint nevertheless.
And it's an article that can actually be read without allowing your political bias to cloud your judgement.
Give it a go - you might learn something.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks