Ain't it strange how whenever circumstantial evidence (like the massive surge in all cause mortality after the covid vaccine roll out) is instantly and voraciously denied to be anything more than coincidence and is hotly denied due to lack of *indisputable* (impossible hurdle) evidence. Strangely, every single vaccine damage research document that might claim to support the circumstantial evidence is rejected in its entirety on the same impossible hurdle basis (failure to provide indisputable proof), and the turd is polished and worshiped all the more fervently by the deniers.
Even in the face of revelations of CDC & FDA evidenced fraudulent research, sampling and approval processes for the vaccines and the NIH active role in the gain of function research that developed the virus and its misinformation activities. Even with all the testing of the vaccines that show unprecedented levels of manufacturing contamination. Never. Not once ever, is there any thought/talk/concession that there is or should be any onus of proof required to support the highly questionable contention that the vaccine had nothing whatsoever to do with the massive surge in all cause mortality after the covid vaccine roll out despite the seemingly obvious correlation between potential cause and devastating effect.
Nope, the turd is polished ever brighter by the deniers with complete disregard for the overwhelmingly obvious stench as they cling to the turd with a passion and call the onlookers fools for questioning their faith in their unproven narrative. The persistence of faith in their non-evidenced narrative is comparable to that of flat-earthers imo.
Bookmarks