Nothing says 'Safe and Effective' like destroying all the data from Australia's giant abandoned vaccine study
https://www.sott.net/article/499064-...-vaccine-study
"Follow the science" they say, right up until they destroy it
In August 2021, as the masses were being coerced and cajoled into vaccinations, the government announced a gigantic long term study with 10,000 Australians that would run for five years. They promised they would include the vaccinated and unvaccinated, and generate 100,000 samples, and 11 million datapoints. No stone would be left unturned to make sure the vaccines were safe and effective. "The Science" was being used to reassure the people.
Less than two years later the data must have looked terrible, because they suddenly stopped the study. They muttered something about archiving the data until more funding was available. (Sure, sure). Now, they want to quietly destroy the data and make sure no one can ever use it, or find out the secrets it hides with an FOI application.
Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.
Australian Science eh?
Funding was stopped in 2023, this step is cleaning up a large number of bio samples which will be costing money to keep in storage.
It is difficult to find any information on the reasons why Queensland Health stopped the study, apart from the conjecture on some websites.
Sent from my SM-S938B using Tapatalk
Just imagine for a minute though what the commercial value of the results would be if they proved MRNA vaccines are safe and side effects are no worse than previously developed vaccines in world history.
This appears to be the new technology moving forward in health industry if you look at where the big investment dollars are flowing.
In terms of safe I mean reassuring the approx third of population that was hesitant about using a new technology inside their bodies. Getting everyone onboard means about doubling your target customer base without need for advertising or legislative assistance. That’s huge in business profits.
I’d estimate an intrinsic value of billions if not a trillion dollars if the data shows the vaccines were safe from such a large scientific study with many other variables also recorded( and current live info available as that states health records are 100% electronic now). Especially if it were to show one manufacturer perhaps had a better product than the others. You’d think big pharma would be falling g over themselves to buy up this data.
Of course perhaps like any other govt program perhaps they messed it up and the data isn’t stored in a meaningful useful way.
Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer
An excellent post in all respects, except the complete omission of the seemingly obvious likelihood that it was abandoned because early indicators suggested less than favourable results in both effectiveness and safety. Results that did not provide the expected dividends that were discussed above. Cynici$m is not just healthy, but essential in understanding changes pushed by corporations and governments in our increasingly corrupted world.
Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.
Appearances suggest that is a load of emotive claptrap written by conspiracy theorists for conspiracy theorists. I had a quick look for confirmation from legitimate news sources but was unable to find much. The story certainly doesn't seem to have caused widespread consternation.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
okay so this post was to broadcast do you know the difference between data which is exactly what you wrote.
and samples which they are not going to continue to store?
in your own link
“Metro North Health has determined that, for a range of reasons including the many mutations of the COVID-19 virus and similar studies from Australia and worldwide, there is no longer a scientific and public health need to retain these biological samples for future study,” said the letter, sent 19 March 2025.
“Therefore, these samples will be appropriately sterilised and disposed of. All study data collected as part of the QoVAX-SET study will be archived for the specified time-period as required by law,
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
A few minutes spent doing a Google search would have found this paper, which is in preprint:
"Adverse Events and Associated Economic Burden of COVID-19 Vaccination in Queensland, Australia: findings from the cross-sectional QoVAX-Statewide study."
Here is a link to the abstract:
https://www.researchgate.net/publica...tatewide_study
I won't spoil it for you, except to note that AEFI means Adverse Event Following Immunisation.
Sent from my SM-S938B using Tapatalk
An excerpt from the Whitehouse web site
https://www.whitehouse.gov/lab-leak-...s-of-covid-19/
COVID-19 MISINFORMATION:
Public health officials often mislead the American people through conflicting messaging, knee-jerk reactions, and a lack of transparency. Most egregiously, the federal government demonized alternative treatments and disfavored narratives, such as the lab leak theory,
in a shameful effort to coerce and control the American people’s health decisions.
When those efforts failed, the Biden Administration resorted to “outright censorship—coercing and colluding with the world’s largest social media companies to censor all COVID-19-related dissent.”
https://www.whitehouse.gov/lab-leak-...s-of-covid-19/
What a shame our own govt aren't as honest
Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.
Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Bookmarks