Trying to be a good dog
So many different autisms.....Originally Posted by Brett
Recent research suggests mothers autoimmune issues [during pregnancy] may account for 25% of autisms...
So many different vaccine injuries....
BTW Andrew Wakefield has been vindicated [just recently] if you are up to speed with vaccine news
Churches are monuments to self importance
Born to be mild
Is that like being vaccinated?
Grow older but never grow up
Trying to be a good dog
many good doctors have been struck off for speaking the truth....Gwen Olsen was a sales rep for pharma, she now speaks out against drug companies....
Churches are monuments to self importance
No8 Wire Extraordinaire
So has Hitler.
Several times, old crusty German men have come out to proclaim 'there was no Holocaust'.
And with a similar level of believability.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Trying to be a good dog
In a court of law, sheeple brain
http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/03/e...uilty-now.html
MMR Doctor Exonerated—Who’s Guilty Now?
The parent autism community is buzzing with excitement over a ruling by a British judge clearing Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s colleague and co-author of all charges against him that arose from a study of the relationship between gut disease, autism, and the MMR vaccine.......
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/3/prweb9262180.htm
Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s Co-Author on Controversial Lancet “MMR Paper” Exonerated of All Charges of Professional Misconduct
Prof. John Walker-Smith won his appeal today against the GMC, the UK’s medical regulatory board that had ruled against both him and Andrew Wakefield for their roles in the 1998 Lancet MMR paper, which raised questions about a link to autism. The complete victory means that Walker-Smith has been returned to the status of a fully licensed physician in the UK......
Churches are monuments to self importance
No8 Wire Extraordinaire
oh that's pretty weak to say the least. A ruling in a court of law doesn't mean that there is a right or a wrong. It means that the legal proceedings favoured one direction in the manner they were argued or interpreted.
The scientific method was designed to remove bull & hyperbole from 'Scientific studies'. But when it is breached the so called studies are not worth more than a marketing brochure.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
It's OK...I've got a spare!
Not quite.
The court hasn't ruled that the research and conclusion was right.
They've ruled that Walker-Smith's main role was in the treatment of the children in the study - not in the study itself, otherwise the General Medical Council would have been right to strike him off.
As I read it, the court has said the GMC did not prove that Walker-Smith was responsible for the research and conclusions so he was undeserving of the punishment.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/20...-doctor-appealWalker-Smith's clinical role focused on treatment related to sick children, while his academic work included collaborating in research with Wakefield.
"It had to decide what Professor Walker-Smith thought he was doing: if he believed he was undertaking research in the guise of clinical investigation and treatment, he deserved the finding that he had been guilty of serious professional misconduct and the sanction of erasure.
"If not, he did not, unless, perhaps, his actions fell outside the spectrum of that which would have been considered reasonable medical practice by an academic clinician.
"Its failure to address and decide that question is an error which goes to the root of its determination. The panel's decision cannot stand. I therefore quash it."
...she took the KT, and left me the Buell to ride....(Blues Brothers)
Bogeyman
... of medical malpractice.
In other words Walker-Smith, (not Wakefield himself) has been cleared of injuring his patients.
No mention whatsoever of the veracity or accuracy of their research, which a decade and a half later seems not to have been reproduced.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Forum whore
and Monsanto are really just misunderstood good guys too. Those very few people who keep blowing their whistle have got it all wrong.
Believe what you want but keep an open mind to the possibility that the good guys maybe aren't good at all. After all it ain't hardly like big business, industry, police, scientists, etc don't lie... often. Nah! Can't be. They are the good guys, everyone else are just schmucks.
BTW. As I have stated before. I ain't saying don't get a vaccination. I am saying make bloody sure you need it if you are going to take a risk, make sure there is a real equal or greater risk to you if you don't take a vaccine.All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed.
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
—
Arthur Schopenhauer, German philosopher (1788 – 1860)
If you can't see the logic in that then frankly you are an idiot.
Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.
Forum whore
do you think that it might just be ever so slightly possible that Wakefield might be victim of a campaign to discredit him? Nah! Couldn't be. What would be the motive? and it ain't like that sort of thing has happened before... frequently.
Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.
Bogeyman
I missed this.
Yes many virus have multiple species in their vector, and we have some immunological reactions to some of them, depending on race. What I meant is that humans had never been a part of Ebola's vector... until all of a sudden there's a minor mutation and we were. Zero immune response. 80-95% fatality rate.
Your "natural" immunity is good for a few percent of us, the first time around. The next minor mutation: who knows?. You can stick your "natural immunity, I want that fucker dead. Dead and gone.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
It's OK...I've got a spare!
The motivation might be that he's wrong and endangering the lives of untold numbers of people.do you think that it might just be ever so slightly possible that Wakefield might be victim of a campaign to discredit him? Nah! Couldn't be. What would be the motive? and it ain't like that sort of thing has happened before... frequently.
...she took the KT, and left me the Buell to ride....(Blues Brothers)
Fully qualified Sifter.
That I do agree with.
Bogeyman
No idea. The fact that his research hasn't been replicated speaks far louder than any paranoid musings you can find on t'interwebs. You can find proof of absolutely anything on teh webs.do you think that it might just be ever so slightly possible that Wakefield might be victim of a campaign to discredit him? Nah! Couldn't be. What would be the motive? and it ain't like that sort of thing has happened before... frequently.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
It's OK...I've got a spare!
Personally I'd rather accept the concensus opinion of the trained professionals.and Monsanto are really just misunderstood good guys too. Those very few people who keep blowing their whistle have got it all wrong.
Believe what you want but keep an open mind to the possibility that the good guys maybe aren't good at all. After all it ain't hardly like big business, industry, police, scientists, etc don't lie... often. Nah! Can't be. They are the good guys, everyone else are just schmucks.
BTW. As I have stated before. I ain't saying don't get a vaccination. I am saying make bloody sure you need it if you are going to take a risk, make sure there is a real equal or greater risk to you if you don't take a vaccine.
If you can't see the logic in that then frankly you are an idiot.
Those guys really know a lot about medicine ya know!
...she took the KT, and left me the Buell to ride....(Blues Brothers)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks