Thinking of getting vaccinated?

[Katman]

So what was your point?

So just how unsafe is it?

Now if your theory doesn't fit one of those, that'll be because it's a conspiracy theory rather than one backed by evidence.

It could almost make one think that all those studies I've linked to that suggest mercury is unsafe in vaccines (you know, the ones you dumb cunts are steadfastly trying to ignore) might just count as evidence.

[bogan]

So just how unsafe is it?

That's a question, not a point.

It could almost make one think that all those studies I've linked to that suggest mercury is unsafe in vaccines (you know, the ones you dumb cunts are steadfastly trying to ignore) might just count as evidence.

Ignore? What happens is you post a study, it gets put into context or outright refuted, then you ignore your own study to go off and post another one without learning anything. The thing about evidence Katman, is that it comes in varying levels of quality, if you could understand and apply that fact, you wouldn't be the bitter, vitriolic, moron that you are today.

[husaberg]

So just how unsafe is it?



It could almost make one think that all those studies I've linked to that suggest mercury is unsafe in vaccines (you know, the ones you dumb cunts are steadfastly trying to ignore) might just count as evidence.

If you are using words such as might , suggests and almost it isn't evidence its specuilation and conjecture. No one expects you to be able to figure that out though.
So keeping on living in your paranoid little world.

[Katman]

If you are using words such as might , suggests and almost it isn't evidence its specuilation and conjecture. No one expects you to be able to figure that out though.
So keeping on living in your paranoid little world.

My words aren't the evidence shitforbrains - the studies are.

[RDJ]

Read these and get back to us K.

http://www.who.int/immunization/docu...tionpapers/en/

[Katman]

Read these and get back to us K.

How about you? Are you still adamant that mercury poses no risk as an ingredient in vaccines?

[bogan]

How about you? Are you still adamant that mercury poses no risk as an ingredient in vaccines?

Mercury isn't an ingredient in vaccines, mercury containing compounds are. You might not understand the difference, and that's fucking amusing.

[Katman]

Mercury isn't an ingredient in vaccines, mercury containing compounds are.

Take a slow read of what I've quoted above and see if you can figure out what's retarded about it.

[bogan]

Take a slow read of what I've quoted above and see if you can figure out what's retarded about it.

Na


10mfchr

[husaberg]

It could almost make one think that all those studies I've linked to that suggest mercury is unsafe in vaccines (you know, the ones you dumb cunts are steadfastly trying to ignore) might just count as evidence.

My words aren't the evidence shitforbrains - the studies are.

Your words are clear evidence, crystal clear evidence of your own unwillingness to treat them as facts. yet you expect others to.
Otherwise you would be much surer of yourself. Your very own choice of words betrays you.
If you believed that they are indeed evidence, you would not need to use words such as maybe, could be, might , suggests and almost and so forth.
The very fact you do, suggests you are deluding yourself. Which is a common narcisistic and sociopathic trait.

[TheDemonLord]

Well I count 25 different names just in that one citation list.

Funny - the 12 cited articles only have 5 unique teams - most of the cited papers are by the Authors of the original paper.

All the papers were published in journals with extremely low IF and by the looks of it, aren't doing their due dilligence (see below) - thus can be described as a Predatory Paper.

And who gives a fuck how many times a particular name comes up? It might just suggest they're a specialist in that field.

Well, if you say "Look at all these scientific papers! It's a topic that is hotly debated amongst scientists", but when we look at those papers - its the work of the same groups of people, a reasonable person would realise that it is just an empty bucket rattling as loud as it can.

Also - interesting that you listen to them as credible experts in their field, suggesting that they are "specialist in that field"... Let's see how Credible they are:

Oh Dear...

Oh Dear Oh Dear

Chemically Castrating kids, just because they have Autism - and it's you who call us Nazis? Josef Mengele would be so proud...

How about the names in the list of references in the other link?

Should we count their names too?

Seriously dude, you take willful ignorance to a whole new level.

There's only one person being Willfully ignorant - and it's the person that props up the insane, fraudulent theory, that is a demonstrable threat to the lives, wellbeing and safety of chlidren, a theory that was created and perpetuated by Conmen who have been struck from the various Medical Registries. Conmen whose sole purpose was to invent a condition in order to profit from it - with the biggest twist of Irony being that you believe them, whilst accusing 'Big Pharma' of doing the same and using it as a reason to spout your deadly moronic crap.

[Woodman]

Two 9/11 conspiracy theorists are in a plane when it crashes. An instant later they find themselves in the afterlife, being judged by Almighty God Himself.

One falls to his knees, "I deplore you, all-powerful Creator of the universe! Before you judge me, I humbly beg you, reveal who was behind the September 11 attacks!"

God sighs. "Muslim extremists. Al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden did it."

His friend leans down and whispers, "Damn, dude. This thing goes way higher up than we ever realized."

[Katman]

One falls to his knees, "I deplore you, all-powerful Creator of the universe!

If he deplores him, what's the guy doing in heaven?

[husaberg]

If he deplores him, what's the guy doing in heaven?

[Katman]