Thinking of getting vaccinated?

[Katman]

You're the one denying it - and we have seen your proof, I still laugh at the one where it was 'Someone told me it was true, I can't provide the source, but it was 100% true'

For a start, I've certainly never made that statement.

And secondly, you clearly still have no proof.

[TheDemonLord]

For a start, I've certainly never made that statement.

And secondly, you clearly still have no proof.

Shall I link your post again and prove you wrong AGAIN?

And yes, I have plenty of proof, you just ignore it as part of a conspiracy...

[nzspokes]

Don't get me wrong. I'm not denying that a great many jews died while imprisoned in concentration camps.

But you will struggle to provide any concrete proof that what has gone down in history as 'gas chambers' were used to kill people.

Towards the end of the war thousands were dying every day from disease and starvation.

WTF?

Go visit Auschwitz. See for yourself what it was built for.

And read post 2168 and tell us what proof you would like?

[Katman]

Shall I link your post again and prove you wrong AGAIN?

Yes, please do.

[Katman]

And read post 2168 and tell us what proof you would like?

Anything you can provide.

[TheDemonLord]

Yes, please do.

http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...post1130940379

[nzspokes]

Anything you can provide.

No, tell us all what would prove it to you?

[Katman]

No, tell us all what would prove it to you?

Well clearly you've got nothing either.

[nzspokes]

Well clearly you've got nothing either.

Come on, man up.

What would prove it to you?

[Katman]

http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...post1130940379

And where does that show me saying 'Someone told me it was true, I can't provide the source, but it was 100% true'?

Are you just making shit up again?

[Katman]

And yes, I have plenty of proof, you just ignore it as part of a conspiracy...

If you had it, you'd provide it.

[TheDemonLord]

And where does that show me saying 'Someone told me it was true, I can't provide the source, but it was 100% true'?

Are you just making shit up again?

No, you are just being a delusional twerp again:

http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...post1130881841

You cited that link as Evidence (and as evidence, the implication that it is factual - ergo 100% true).

That link contains the line explicitly stating:

Thanks to a document that I obtained from American researcher Mark Weber, who gave me a copy of it in Washington in September of 1983 (a document whose exact source I not yet authorized to indicate),

Which is in effect (with some paraphrasing and implied meanings) - you saying:

'Someone told me it was true, I can't provide the source, but it was 100% true'

Because you:

a: Presented it as evidence (with the implication that it is true)
b: The evidence is based on heresay testimony (with the author stating he can't provide the source)
c: Combined those two things - we get the implied statement that someone told you it was true, you can't provide the source, but it was 100% true.

[TheDemonLord]

If you had it, you'd provide it.

I've provided it multiple times, but each time you dismiss it as part of a conspiracy.

[Katman]

I've provided it multiple times, but each time you dismiss it as part of a conspiracy.

Do you really think that an inward opening door on a homicidal gas chamber makes any sense?

[TheDemonLord]

Do you really think that an inward opening door on a homicidal gas chamber makes any sense?

It makes perfect sense.