i Struggle with the the bit where you deny reality. The place where you change the the facts quoted and swap in the authors opinion. I find this especially odd where they very clearly categorically state they will be retaining the data in the article you yourself choose as proof.
It's not a surprise for you to do this you do have previous form in being pig ignorant when you are clearly wrong.
Like the time you claimed farmers send 100kg plus rodeo calves to the works when the works don't accept cattle this size.
Or that time you claimed there was numerous alternatives to 1080 on the vast inaccessible areas of NZ ,yet you couldn't name a single one.
Or that time you claimed some animals were poisoned on their own property by 1080, when by the owners own admission, they had wandered into a DOC area.
Or that time you posted a engine (the Geet)that was a well known fraud, that was supposed to run on coffee or water and you refused to admit it was a made up piece of shit. You even called him a modern day telsa when in truth, he said he got the technology from an angel named Mrs Cunningham. He invented nothing other than a new way to scam money of idiots.
Or that time you claimed there were no gas chambers at in German concentration camps, when even the two convicted fraudsters you quoted as being proof, admitted it was obvious there were gas chambers.
Or that time you kept claiming ad nausea, the WTC buildings fell at free-fall speed, when the clearly did not
Or that time you claimed they collapsed into their own footprints when they clearly did not.
Or that time when you quoted state trooper Lyle Szupink as saying something, he clearly did not, about United Airlines Flight 93.
Or that time you claimed over and over that an engine was found to be a distance away from the crash site when it was in fact, found less than a third of that distance.
Or that time you kept claiming passports, were never found intact after a high speed impact like 911, when in fact they commonly are.
Or that time you claimed the UFA investigation was independent , full or transparent, when it was clearly none of these three.
Or that times you repeatedly make and pass on false claims about vaccine and vaccine safety often implying, you know more than genuine medical experts, when you have no medial training at all.
Or that time you claimed it was uncommon for bikes to have footpegs mounted to the swingarm when tens if not 100's of millions of bikes were made in over 120 models with this exact set up.
Originally Posted by Katman
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks