Thinking of getting vaccinated?

[SaferRides]

French study on 28 million people

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41343214/

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...135-1/fulltext

https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/cont...01836.full.pdf

First paper is interesting. "Sensitivity analysis revealed that vaccinated individuals consistently had a lower risk of death, regardless of the cause."

No discussion of why? Probably some difference between the groups that wasn't allowed for, or maybe it's real. I hope this study will be repeated in other countries.

Sent from my SM-S938B using Tapatalk

[Katman]

https://www.jpands.org/vol30no4/kuna...00847035689775

[SaferRides]

https://www.jpands.org/vol30no4/kuna...00847035689775

Where was this published?

Anyway, yeah, nah. It was an emergency and corners were cut. You do wonder what people obviously at risk from preexisting conditions were doing in a vaccine trial though, especially during lockdown situations.

Covering up the myocarditis risk should not have happened, and those deaths could have been avoided.

But all drug trials are fundamentaly flawed as they should be carried out independently, not by the drug company.


Sent from my SM-S938B using Tapatalk

[Katman]

Where was this published?

Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

[Katman]

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/bre...dRedirect=true

[husaberg]

Where was this published?

Anyway, yeah, nah. It was an emergency and corners were cut. You do wonder what people obviously at risk from preexisting conditions were doing in a vaccine trial though, especially during lockdown situations.

Covering up the myocarditis risk should not have happened, and those deaths could have been avoided.

But all drug trials are fundamentaly flawed as they should be carried out independently, not by the drug company.


Sent from my SM-S938B using Tapatalk

Have a look at the creditials of the authors. Dig a little deeper and see what they really are.

[SaferRides]

Have a look at the creditials of the authors. Dig a little deeper and see what they really are.

You just have to look at the reference list... Anyway, I await the reply with interest.

Sent from my SM-S938B using Tapatalk

[mashman]

No discussion of why? Probably some difference between the groups that wasn't allowed for, or maybe it's real. I hope this study will be repeated in other countries.

Sent from my SM-S938B using Tapatalk

Could be. Then again, the vaccine wasn't designed to do anything other than prevent covid. On that basis: MRNA tech does not work as expected/tested. T'would seem like a worthy talking point given the evidence to date.

[sugilite:Me]

Have a look at the creditials of the authors. Dig a little deeper and see what they really are.

The very same "authors" have spelling issues too - as they seem to think a peer review is something that only happens when buying fruit in the produce department at the local supermarket.

[SaferRides]

Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

LoL, from Wikipedia:

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is a politically conservative non-profit association that promotes conspiracy theories and medical misinformation, such as HIV/AIDS denialism, climate change denial, the abortion–breast cancer hypothesis, and vaccine and autism connections, through its official publication, the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, a legitimate scientific journal. The association was founded in 1943 to oppose a government attempt to nationalize health care. The group has included notable members, including American Republican politicians Ron Paul, Rand Paul and Tom Price.[3]

Sent from my SM-S938B using Tapatalk

[SaferRides]

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/bre...dRedirect=true

This is a rant, not a paper.

I read the (unpublished) Lamerato et al paper after the Congressional hearing, and it appeared that the differences between the cohorts may have been a reason for the differences. It seems I wasn't the only one. https://www.henryford.com/news/2025/...udy-fact-check

Anyway, I'll leave you all in peace for a while. Merry Christmas!

[Katman]

LoL, from Wikipedia:

You do know that Wikipedia can be edited by any old retard, don't you?

[husaberg]

The very same "authors" have spelling issues too - as they seem to think a peer review is something that only happens when buying fruit in the produce department at the local supermarket.

This is a rant, not a paper.

I read the (unpublished) Lamerato et al paper after the Congressional hearing, and it appeared that the differences between the cohorts may have been a reason for the differences. It seems I wasn't the only one. https://www.henryford.com/news/2025/...udy-fact-check

Anyway, I'll leave you all in peace for a while. Merry Christmas!

here are the deaths in the pacebo section of the trial.
looks like the only smoking gun was from taupo Steve chaffing his lips on some conspiracy sites cock.LOL

[Katman]

here are the deaths in the pacebo section of the trial LOL

That's a weird thing to have a lol about.

[husaberg]

LoL, from Wikipedia:

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is a politically conservative non-profit association that promotes conspiracy theories and medical misinformation, such as HIV/AIDS denialism, climate change denial, the abortion–breast cancer hypothesis, and vaccine and autism connections, through its official publication, the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, a legitimate scientific journal. The association was founded in 1943 to oppose a government attempt to nationalize health care. The group has included notable members, including American Republican politicians Ron Paul, Rand Paul and Tom Price.[3]

Sent from my SM-S938B using Tapatalk

The Association of "American Physicians and Surgeons" .... odd that neither of authors meet this description.......