It's not that hard to find the NZ schedule.
https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/...ation-schedule
It's not that hard to find the NZ schedule.
https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/...ation-schedule
it's not a bad thing till you throw a KLR into the mix.
those cheap ass bitches can do anything with ductape.
(PostalDave on ADVrider)
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
More factual than this?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...46672X19305784
Did you read that? More importantly, did you miss the part where the whole thing is still hypotheses?
Scientists are only just now beginning to break through the blood/brain barrier for the purpose of treatments.
As in, they can barely do it on purpose and you're trying to say vaccines have been doing it all along.
You do not understand the shit you are posting in the fucking slightest, but you seem to think we're too stupid to notice.
"DMT is not active orally because it is destroyed by the action of the MAO enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract, but in the presence of a MAO inhibitor, DMT can enter the circulatory system and penetrate the blood–brain barrier, thereby producing its effects.".
Are they? Bit behind the times eh... or perhaps they're having issues stopping things crossing the blood brain barrier in a certain percentage of the population? The or hypothesis was added for shits n giggles, but it would explain a thing or two ... having said that, the likelihood of us getting any truth from anyone without their wages relying on their answers, or at the very least severely denting their "reputation", is pretty fuckin' slim these days. Vaccine damage exists and has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. Are we ACTUALLY "damaging" more than we're HYPOTHETICALLY "saving"?... obviously damaging is a sliding scale and hard to measure given the ages that some of these kids just leave their prior state of well-being.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Y'all dont know the difference between theory and hypothesis, or you're just choosing to ignore it?
One is a possibility, the other is backed by evidence.
The study I've posted above Drew is backed by evidence.
The authors have calculated the aluminium content in the series of vaccinations that new-borns up to 7 months are administered and measured it against the rate at which 'medical science' states that the body eliminates aluminium.
The results show that up to 7 months old, babies are subjected to 15.9 times what is considered the safe level of aluminium in their system and the amount over and above the safe level is there in their systems for 70% of that 7 month life period.
Did you not read the study?
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
There are currently 49 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 49 guests)
Bookmarks