Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 56

Thread: Psychoactive Substances Bill

  1. #16
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    9,015
    Quote Originally Posted by mashman View Post
    I agree entirely. We have a user base of several hundred thousand recreational users. I guarantee you the cost of legalising cannabis, setting up a database, asking people to register and then monitoring their health through the current health system would cost by far less than jamming animals full of synthetic crap will be. But nooooooooo, they're too stupid for that. Much better to have criminals profiting.
    Unfortunately the government is aware that animals can't sue them in years to come for health issues that arise from the testing.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    6th May 2008 - 14:15
    Bike
    She resents being called a bike
    Location
    Wellllie
    Posts
    1,494
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    Unfortunately the government is aware that animals can't sue them in years to come for health issues that arise from the testing.
    I get that side of it... however we do it voluntarily (and could apply for a license ), who the fuck are we going to sue and for what reason? We're not the US... yet.
    I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!

  3. #18
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    9,015
    Quote Originally Posted by mashman View Post
    I get that side of it... however we do it voluntarily (and could apply for a license ), who the fuck are we going to sue and for what reason? We're not the US... yet.
    Sorry but we're not talking about cannabis here. There would be no need for testing in order for cannabis to be legalised. It's been around forever.

    The government were never going to allow themselves to be seen as using their citizens as guinea pigs for testing new synthetic drugs.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    6th May 2008 - 14:15
    Bike
    She resents being called a bike
    Location
    Wellllie
    Posts
    1,494
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    Sorry but we're not talking about cannabis here. There would be no need for testing in order for cannabis to be legalised. It's been around forever.

    The government were never going to allow themselves to be seen as using their citizens as guinea pigs for testing new synthetic drugs.
    In which case you've taken your eye off the ball. Remember that debate they had on the telly when the synthetic drug rep stated that should Cannabis legalised demand for their product would vanish? Why is it called synthetic Cannabis? Yes it has been around for ever and it has only been illegal for a short time because of corporate greed. Cannabis status IS the debate.

    Who's a guinea pig? If I choose to smoke it, which I did (and then promptly stopped after a few months use), then I will and no govt will tell me otherwise and no govt should have that power. A bunch of snot nosed spoilt brats and a bunch of propaganda to instill reefer madness into the people. Anyone who has bought into that shit needs their head examined... in fact I'd rather spending the testing money on that.
    I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!

  5. #20
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    9,015
    Quote Originally Posted by mashman View Post
    Cannabis status IS the debate.
    Only in so far as it's illegality has led to the synthetic cannabis market.

    The question of testing drugs on animals is not about cannabis.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    6th May 2008 - 14:15
    Bike
    She resents being called a bike
    Location
    Wellllie
    Posts
    1,494
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    Only in so far as it's illegality has led to the synthetic cannabis market.

    The question of testing drugs on animals is not about cannabis.
    How can you offer the first statement and then throw up that last statement. Testing of drugs on animals in this case is only because of the status of Cannabis. They're shifting the debate, don't buy it man.
    I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!

  7. #22
    Join Date
    16th December 2006 - 01:50
    Bike
    Trans NZ Broliner
    Location
    Stuck on a roundabout
    Posts
    190
    NZ is the guinea pig for the whole world

    Synthetic highs have a big long term future

    albeit.... all because of patenting and manipulation of substances, *for profit* AND POPULATION CONTROLS

    All nature based things like opiates, cocaine and cannabis are preferable to users....

    But not preferable to companies who want control of the global high market, via patents

    Worth a pretty penny indeed..... they will push gangs off the ball and wish to run with it themselves

    Current producers doing deals with state but are in for a surprise butt fucking

    As far as morality of testing goes, current animal testing of Pharma products is no different, as most of these tests are of substances that do little good, fuck peeps up..... even after testing.

    And preferable to users natural options are dismissed as ineffective by corporation paid disinformation bots, who manipulate sheeple brains with ease

    FUCK THE SYSTEM, ITS ALL BULLSHIT
    Churches are monuments to self importance

  8. #23
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    9,015
    Quote Originally Posted by scissorhands View Post
    NZ is the guinea pig for the whole world
    Except that there are many countries that have banned the use of animals in recreational drug testing.

    We seem to be falling behind in that respect.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    16th December 2006 - 01:50
    Bike
    Trans NZ Broliner
    Location
    Stuck on a roundabout
    Posts
    190
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    Except that there are many countries that have banned the use of animals in recreational drug testing.

    We seem to be falling behind in that respect.
    bit like the UK banning sow stalls for cheap pork
    now they just import it from Poland...
    which has set up more farms to cater to the UK market

    Why should outspoken non testing countries, risk revolt by testing when NZ will do it for them?

    also these same countries use pharma drugs tested on animals

    which country the testing is performed in, is really a moot issue, at the end of the day

    the peep that buys these products, supports testing no matter where it is performed

    I hear NZers also dont care about state supplied and fitted, butt fuck apparatus.... all good mate, she'll be right
    Churches are monuments to self importance

  10. #25
    Join Date
    10th December 2005 - 15:33
    Bike
    77' CB750 Cafe Racer, 2009 Z750
    Location
    Majorka'
    Posts
    1,395
    Animal testing happens all the time all over the world on nearly every new cleaning product, medicine, vaccine, perfume, makeup, anti aging product- why the sudden outrage?
    I love the smell of twin V16's in the morning..

  11. #26
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    9,015
    Quote Originally Posted by jonbuoy View Post
    Animal testing happens all the time all over the world on nearly every new cleaning product, medicine, vaccine, perfume, makeup, anti aging product- why the sudden outrage?
    It's not a sudden outrage.

    I've always been against the use of animals for the testing of cosmetics or recreational drugs.

    The current issue is due to the public presentation of this particular Bill.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    12th July 2003 - 01:10
    Bike
    Royal Enfield 650 & a V8 or two..
    Location
    The Riviera of the South
    Posts
    14,068
    Quote Originally Posted by jonbuoy View Post
    Animal testing happens all the time all over the world on nearly every new cleaning product, medicine, vaccine, perfume, makeup, anti aging product- why the sudden outrage?
    Gotta start somewhere...
    Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........
    " Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"

  13. #28
    Join Date
    10th December 2005 - 15:33
    Bike
    77' CB750 Cafe Racer, 2009 Z750
    Location
    Majorka'
    Posts
    1,395
    You must have to be a special kind of person to rub soap into a rabbits eye or inject a dog with something you know is toxic and will cause an animal extreme distress. I can see the reason behind it for life saving medical purposes. But to prove something you already know or just to sell an anti ageing product to someone desperate to hold onto their youth is abhorrent.

    Back in the 80's I seem to remember big campaigns against animal testing - wonder why it fell out of the public eye? Humans are disgusting creatures at times.
    I love the smell of twin V16's in the morning..

  14. #29
    Join Date
    17th April 2011 - 14:39
    Bike
    Honda VF750f.
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    4,330


    For a man is a slave to whatever has mastered him. Keep an open mind, just dont let your brains fall out.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    16th December 2006 - 01:50
    Bike
    Trans NZ Broliner
    Location
    Stuck on a roundabout
    Posts
    190
    The autistic liberation front
    Churches are monuments to self importance

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •