Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: Waterless coolant

  1. #16
    Join Date
    10th December 2005 - 15:33
    Bike
    77' CB750 Cafe Racer, 2009 Z750
    Location
    Majorka'
    Posts
    1,395
    It would seem that many F1 teams are still running water based coolant but there is an FAA recommendation to run waterless coolant running some Rotax engines - but this is just to avoid a possible loss of coolant if the engine starts to overheat rather than actually offering more heat transfer in the first place. Its like the Synthetic vs Mineral oil debate - some will swear by it some will swear at it.

    I like the idea of not having to pressurise the cooling system - less chance of blowing seals, hoses or water pump leaks. The engine I have has known corrosion problems in water ways so thats a bonus too.

    Would be nice to see two tests on an engine dyno with readouts for oil temp and cylinder head temps. If it does prevent steam pockets around the cylinder head this won´t show up just measuring block or coolant fluid temps.
    I love the smell of twin V16's in the morning..

  2. #17
    Join Date
    25th April 2009 - 17:38
    Bike
    RC36, RC31, KR-E, CR125
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    7,364
    Just collect a bunch of engine oil from oil changes, then tip it in once you enough. Sure to work, right?
    "A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal

  3. #18
    Join Date
    7th May 2010 - 19:43
    Bike
    2004 SV1K
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    2,103
    Quote Originally Posted by bogan View Post
    Just collect a bunch of engine oil from oil changes, then tip it in once you enough. Sure to work, right?

    Bang some fucking 80W/90 gear oil it,
    Bigger numbers mean it should work right?


    Just put 100% Glycol in the bitch and be done with it.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    7th December 2012 - 18:25
    Bike
    Speed Triple R
    Location
    Oxford
    Posts
    100
    The waterless coolant I am looking at does not boil so that shouldn't need a reservoir filled with fluid and overflow hose etc = weight saving reasonably cheap.
    Only a thought, I'm no physicist so I may be wrong.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •