I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Dude! You is back playing skittles! You little fibber you.
Did you sort this vile bit of racism out and I missed your post!?!?!!! It would be a shame to leave it blighting your reputation.
You treat the fact that people sometimes lie and, heaven forbid, have suspect motives as though you've been bitch slapped with a Scud missile. Everybody else got it a long time ago... because they have that ability too.
So are you saying that you're NOT certain that the rebels did the deed? That's not the impression you gave me from your first post. Mind you... now that the US hasn't attacked and the UK hasn't assisted them I suppose it's inevitable that you must reconsider your entire story.
Here's the link to the Human Rights Watch article on the Damascus attack.
http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/09/17/d...in-flight-path
I assumed that these folks were outside the usual political channels but I realise they're not of the calibre of the Ronnie Corbett News Report or "Really angry Barbie". Hell maybe they're even Mossad stooges.
I'm really not sure what all the sheep are bleating about so enthusiastically. The actual outcome was equal to or more than I could have hoped for. The missile attack on Syria has stalled. I guess that means that millions of people who 'like me' either had the desired impact or simply backed the right horse as far as desired outcomes.
I'm a happy man.though looking around I guess some of the sad folk who didn't like being told that Syria shouldn't be attacked, are pretty pissed, because they sure are crying up a storm trying to get a re-count.
Sorry fella's. This round is over and the good guys won again.![]()
Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Maybe the threat of missile strikes was what helped get the joint Russian-American action going?
After all, it's not like the Russians were doing much about the chemical weapons before then.
It seems very simplistic to assume the current result was just a back down.
What will make the Syrian government comply? Without the threat of strikes ... what do they have to "encourage" giving up the chemical weapons?
Measure once, cut twice. Practice makes perfect.
Very true. I do wonder if it's going to be a case of history repeating though. Read a few "reports" recently of Iraq wanting to have peace talks with the US, to the point where he said that they'd have elections and allow access for inspectors to check for weapons. The US said no and went hard. Maybe that'll be a deterrent for Assad. I hope so.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks